Tesla, Inc.

TSLA Consumer Cyclical · Auto Manufacturers
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$362.44
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$297.38 — $498.83
-27% from high
Market cap
1.4T
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
—
No dividend declared
P/E
335.6
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Fairly valued.

Tesla's 2025 net income fell 47% while operating cash flow stayed near $14.75 billion.

Neutral Beneish: -1.35Altman Z″: 4.46
RED DEEP 60 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-1.35
High manipulation likelihood
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
4.46
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

Read together, the filings describe a company investing heavily in future products while its reported earnings shrink. Revenue for 2025 was $94.83 billion, a 2.9% decline, and net income attributable to common stockholders was $3.79 billion, down $3.30 billion. The MD&A says growth has allowed the business to generally fund itself, and operating cash flow of $14.75 billion, compared with $14.92 billion in 2024, supports that claim. The Altman Z″-Score of 4.46 falls in the safe zone, and because Tesla is an industrial manufacturer rather than a bank or financial firm, that label applies as designed. The operating cash flow to net income ratio of 3.89 is high mainly because net income fell while cash generation held steady, so readers may want to look at the depreciation and working-capital lines in the cash flow statement to understand the gap. The Beneish M-Score of -1.354 is in the elevated manipulation-risk zone. That places it among the scores that call for closer scrutiny of the notes, particularly the revenue, receivables, and accrual disclosures. It does not establish that anything was misstated. On the balance sheet, total liabilities of $54.94 billion against $137.81 billion in assets leave equity at $82.14 billion, while long-term debt rose to $6.58 billion from $5.54 billion. Cash and investments of $44.06 billion, up $7.50 billion, provide a substantial buffer. Automotive regulatory credits for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 were $1,451 million, compared with $2,071 million a year earlier. The 10-Q excerpt supplied contains financial statements rather than risk-factor text, so the risk discussion here relies on the 10-K MD&A.

Catalyst.Management's 2025 narrative centers on AI and new products. The 10-K describes the June 2025 Robotaxi launch, FSD (Supervised), the purpose-built Cybercab, and Optimus, alongside a refreshed vehicle lineup that included the new Model Y. Vehicle output was about 1.66 million produced and 1.64 million delivered. In energy, Tesla deployed 46.7 GWh of storage in 2025 and introduced Megapack 3 and Megablock, with Megafactory ramps in Shanghai and Lathrop, California, and a new one under construction near Houston, Texas. Reported results have not yet caught up with that push: revenue fell to $94.83 billion, down $2.86 billion, and capital expenditures dropped to $8.53 billion from $11.34 billion.

Hidden risk.The most material tension is between the growth narrative and reported earnings. Operating income fell to $4.36 billion from $7.08 billion, and net income attributable to common stockholders fell to $3.79 billion from $7.09 billion. Research and development expense rose to $4,628 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, from $3,264 million a year earlier, an increase of about 42%. The Beneish M-Score of -1.354 falls in the elevated manipulation-risk zone. That is a screening flag that calls for a closer reading of the filings, not proof of misconduct. The 10-K also flags tariffs and the removal of EV tax credits under OBBBA as pressures on demand and battery costs.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what TSLA reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
2.0%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
70.9M
Change since Aug 31
−4.4%
Days to cover
1.8

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against TSLA. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (−4.4%).

At normal trading volume, short sellers could buy back every borrowed share in under two days.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Tesla filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Oct 2, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 29, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 1.01: Signed a material agreement; Item 1.02: Ended a material agreement; Item 2.03: New debt or other financial obligation
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 22, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 22, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Jan 29, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    EDGAR →
  • Jan 28, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-01-28)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Jan 2, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-01-02)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Nov 7, 2025
    8-K
    Current report (2025-11-06)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors; Item 5.07: Shareholder vote results0
    EDGAR →
  • Oct 23, 2025
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2025-09-30)Period: 2025-09-300
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 17, 2025
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2025-11-06)0
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →