Blackstone Inc.
BX Financial Services · Asset ManagementWatch.
Blackstone's 2025 revenue and operating cash flow rose, but earnings depend on volatile fund performance.
The four readings.
What the filing actually says.
The Piotroski F-Score is 6 of 7 computable signals, meaning six of the seven signals that could be computed from the data were met. It is a checklist of profitability, leverage and efficiency tests rather than a verdict on quality, and the label does not say which signal was not met, so readers may want to check the financial statements directly. The Fog Index of 19.41 places the MD&A in the very hard to read band, above 18, which suggests the management narrative is dense for a general reader. Operating cash flow divided by net income is 1.54, meaning 2025 operating cash flow of $4.66 billion ran well ahead of $3.02 billion in net income. That ratio alone does not establish earnings quality. No Beneish M-Score or Altman Z″-Score is on file, so this synthesis offers neither a manipulation screen nor a financial-distress zone. The filings point to several company-specific items: the Blackstone Holdings partnerships and the Seventh Amended and Restated Exchange Agreement dated July 2, 2026; the Series II preferred stock held by Blackstone Group Management L.L.C., which gives that holder significant voting power, and the filing's description of Blackstone as a controlled company; obligations to repay Performance Allocations from carry funds if performance falls; and payments owed to senior managing directors for certain tax deductions. Total Assets Under Management and Fee-Earning Assets Under Management are defined at length in the 10-K, and the filing says these measures may not be comparable to those of other asset managers, so readers may want to compare definitions before relying on them. At year-end 2025, liabilities of $25.83 billion against equity of $8.67 billion, with long-term debt of $12.58 billion, describe a leveraged balance sheet. The risk factors also cover litigation, regulation, cybersecurity, artificial intelligence and climate-related scrutiny. Readers may want to look at the full risk-factor section and the complete MD&A text before drawing conclusions from the headline growth figures.
Catalyst.The 2025 annual figures show revenue of $14.45 billion, up 9.2% from $13.23 billion in 2024, with net income rising to $3.02 billion from $2.78 billion. Operating cash flow was $4.66 billion, up from $3.48 billion. The 10-Q excerpt provided for the period ended June 30, 2026 is mostly procedural: it covers share repurchase program references, Rule 10b5-1 trading plan language, a July 2, 2026 exchange agreement, and a September 22, 2026 virtual annual meeting with no stockholder votes scheduled. It contains no discussion of business drivers, and no news headlines were on file, so the operating forces behind these results cannot be read from this data.
Hidden risk.Revenue has swung widely, from $22.58 billion in 2021 to $8.52 billion in 2022, and the 10-K risk factors warn that revenue, earnings, net income and cash flow can all vary materially. Operating cash flow followed a similar path, falling from $6.34 billion in 2022 to $4.06 billion in 2023. The risk factors also describe obligations to repay Performance Allocations previously paid if fund performance declines. Total liabilities rose 7.8% in 2025 to $25.83 billion while equity rose 5.6% to $8.67 billion. The MD&A readability score of 19.41 is in the very hard to read band, so a casual reader could easily miss these caveats.
What traders are betting.
The metric
Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.
- Shares sold short
- 22.6M
- Change since Aug 31
- +5.0%
- Days to cover
- 5.4
What it tells us
Few traders are betting against BX. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.
Little changed since the Aug 31 report (+5.0%).
Short sellers would need about 5.4 days of normal trading to buy back every borrowed share. A slow exit like that can make a rush to cover sharper.
How investors use it
- Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
- Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
- Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
- Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.
Annual report & quarterly reports
The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q) and current reports (8-K) Blackstone filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.
- Oct 15, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-10-09)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors0EDGAR →
- Sep 22, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-09-22)Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0EDGAR →
- Aug 7, 202610-QQuarterly report (2026-06-30)Period: 2026-06-300EDGAR →
- Jul 23, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-07-23)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0EDGAR →
- Apr 23, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-04-23)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0EDGAR →
- Mar 24, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-03-24)Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0EDGAR →
- Feb 27, 202610-KAnnual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310EDGAR →
- Jan 29, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-01-29)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0EDGAR →
- Nov 7, 202510-QQuarterly report (2025-09-30)Period: 2025-09-300EDGAR →
If this case caught your eye
Financial Shenanigans
Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.
View on Amazon →The Interpretation of Financial Statements
The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.
View on Amazon →Quality of Earnings
Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.
View on Amazon →