Abbott Laboratories

ABT Healthcare · Medical Devices
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$104.68
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$81.97 — $132.03
-21% from high
Market cap
181.1B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
2.4%
P/E
33.8
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Deep value.

Sales rose 5.7% in 2025 while net income fell roughly half before Exact Sciences deal.

Bullish Beneish: -2.51Altman Z″: 4.80Piotroski: 5/9
RED DEEP 83 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.51
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
4.80
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
5
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The filing excerpt shows core businesses strengthening, but reported earnings, debt presentation and the pending acquisition deserve a closer read. Operating cash flow was $9.57 billion in 2025 against $8.56 billion in 2024. The ratio of operating cash flow to net income is 1.47, meaning cash generation ran ahead of accounting profit this year, which is a plain check on whether earnings turn into cash. The Beneish M-Score is -2.508, below the -1.78 threshold, and its code-assigned label is not in the elevated manipulation-risk zone. This model compares many ratios between years to screen for patterns associated with earnings manipulation. A score below -1.78 is not flagged, though it is a screen, not an audit conclusion. The Altman Z″-Score is 4.80, in the safe zone of 2.60 or above. This model estimates bankruptcy risk for non-financial firms, and this score suggests low distress risk. The Piotroski F-Score and Fog Index are not on file, so they are not assessed here. Long-term debt figures also differ: the XBRL data shows $9.9 billion for 2025, while the MD&A cites $12.9 billion, so readers may want to confirm which measure they are comparing. Rebates are another area to watch. Rebates and chargebacks were $4.8 billion, or 21.1 percent of gross sales, in 2025, and a one-percentage-point increase would reduce net sales by about $225 million. Readers may also want to look at the Diagnostics and Nutritional Products segments, where COVID-19 declines and lower U.S. volumes are visible, alongside the financing for the Exact Sciences acquisition.

Catalyst.Medical Devices is the main driver. Its sales grew 11.9 percent excluding foreign exchange in 2025, led by Diabetes Care, where continuous glucose monitoring sales reached $7.6 billion in 2025 versus $6.4 billion in 2024. Management also cites FDA approval of the Volt PFA System and the Tendyne TMVR system. Consolidated operating margin rose to 18.2 percent in 2025 from 16.3 percent in 2024, and Medical Devices operating margin reached 33.7 percent. Offsetting this, Diagnostics sales fell 4.5 percent excluding foreign exchange as COVID-19 testing sales dropped to $297 million from $747 million.

Hidden risk.The largest tension is between reported profit and the pending deal. Net income was $6.52 billion in 2025, down from $13.4 billion in 2024, even though operating income rose to $8.05 billion. The excerpt provided does not explain that gap, so readers may want to look at the income statement and notes. On November 19, 2025, Abbott agreed to acquire Exact Sciences for $105 per share in cash, about $21 billion in equity value and $23 billion in enterprise value, and obtained a bridge facility of up to $20.0 billion. Year-end cash and short-term investments were $8.9 billion. Closing depends on Exact Sciences shareholder approval and regulatory clearances.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what ABT reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
0.9%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
13.6M
Change since Aug 31
−38.4%
Days to cover
1.6

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against ABT. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Short sellers closed some of their bets: shares sold short fell 38.4% since the Aug 31 report.

At normal trading volume, short sellers could buy back every borrowed share in under two days.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly report & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly report (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Abbott Laboratories filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Aug 20, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials); Item 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 28, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 16, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 17, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-10)Item 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 16, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-16)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 23, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-03-23)Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits . (d) Exhibits. Exhibit No. Exhibit 2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 19, 2025, by and among Ab0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 13, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-04-24)0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 9, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-03-09)Item 1.01: Signed a material agreement0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 26, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-02-23)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 20, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 20, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-02-20)Item 5.03: Charter or bylaw change; fiscal-year change0
    EDGAR →
  • Jan 22, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-01-22)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →