Zoetis Inc.

ZTS Healthcare · Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$78.42
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$68.77 — $148.30
-47% from high
Market cap
32.4B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
2.7%
P/E
12.7
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Fairly valued.

Zoetis revenue grew 2.3% in 2025, but debt rose to $9.04 billion as equity fell.

Neutral Beneish: -2.45Piotroski: 6/9
RED DEEP 74 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.45
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
6
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The filings show a company whose reported revenue and earnings grew modestly in 2025 while its balance sheet became more leveraged. Total liabilities rose to $12.14 billion from $9.47 billion, and liabilities equaled about 78.5% of total assets at year-end 2025 compared with about 66.5% a year earlier. Operating cash flow was $2.9 billion in 2025 versus $2.95 billion in 2024, a slight decline, even as net income rose to $2.67 billion. The ratio of operating cash flow to net income is 1.09, meaning cash generation roughly tracked reported earnings. The forensic scores give a mixed but mostly reassuring picture. The Beneish M-Score for 2025 is -2.448, which is below the -1.78 threshold and is labeled not in the elevated zone; this is a screening result that did not flag elevated manipulation risk, not proof that the financials are accurate. The Altman Z-Score is 4.49, in the safe zone above 2.99, though it is a broad distress screen rather than a measure of this company's specific debt risk. The Piotroski F-Score is 6 of 8 computable signals, a checklist of profitability, leverage, and efficiency tests; because only the computable signals are counted, it is not directly comparable to a full nine-test scale. The Fog Index is not on file, so no readability assessment is offered here. The filing risk discussion ties the business to several items readers may want to look at: tariffs and trade measures affecting China, Canada, and the European Union; foreign exchange exposure, with about 47% of Q1 2026 revenue denominated in foreign currencies; generic competition as patents on certain key products expire; and disease outbreaks that could force production halts at main sites. The largest customer, a U.S. veterinary distributor, accounted for about 16% of 2025 revenue, a concentration worth tracking. Readers may also want to look at the Atlanta, Georgia manufacturing site purchased in 2023 and the ERP-driven fiscal alignment, since changes in timing can distort quarter-to-quarter comparisons.

Catalyst.Full-year 2025 revenue reached $9.47 billion, up 2.3% from $9.26 billion in 2024, and net income rose to $2.67 billion from $2.49 billion. In the first quarter of 2026, revenue was $2,262 million versus $2,198 million, a 3% increase, and the MD&A states that foreign exchange favorably affected year-over-year revenue growth by approximately 4%. Research and development expenses were $698 million in 2025, supporting more than 300 programs, with a significant share focused on product lifecycle innovation that broadens existing products into new species, formulations, and countries.

Hidden risk.The most easily missed item is the Fiscal Year Alignment. Effective January 1, 2026, Zoetis eliminated the one-month reporting lag for its international subsidiaries and moved their year-end to December 31. The filing says this pulled sales into the fourth quarter of 2025, adding an approximate 2.5% to 3.5% increase to International segment sales, a trend it does not expect to recur at the end of 2026. Some December 2025 customer orders were also delayed into the first quarter of 2026, so quarterly comparisons are distorted. Separately, long-term debt rose to $9.04 billion from $5.22 billion while equity fell to $3.33 billion from $4.77 billion.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what ZTS reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
5.1%
of the shares available to trade
Moderate
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
18.4M
Change since Aug 31
−5.2%
Days to cover
4.0

What it tells us

A noticeable minority of traders is betting that ZTS shares will fall.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (−5.2%).

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 4.0 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Zoetis filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Oct 13, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors; Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Oct 8, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 6, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 6, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 6, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • May 7, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    EDGAR →
  • May 7, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-05-07)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 8, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2025-12-31)0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 12, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 12, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-02-12)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 5, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-02-05)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →