Zebra Technologies Corporation

ZBRA Technology · Communication Equipment
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$377.51
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$199.05 — $390.80
-3% from high
Market cap
17.9B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
—
No dividend declared
P/E
34.6
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Deep value.

Zebra's sales grew 8.3% in 2025, but profit fell as costs rose.

Bullish Beneish: -2.56Altman Z″: 3.30Piotroski: 5/9
RED DEEP 83 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.56
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
3.30
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
5
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The forensic scores give a mixed but not alarming picture. The Beneish M-Score is -2.559, which is below -1.78 and therefore not in the elevated manipulation-risk zone; it is a screening measure, so a non-elevated reading reduces but does not eliminate the need for careful reading. The Altman Z″-Score is 3.30, in the safe zone, which suggests the balance sheet is not showing distress under that model. The Piotroski F-Score is 5 of 9 computable signals, a middling result consistent with profit weakening even as sales grew. The operating cash flow to net income ratio is 2.19, meaning $917 million of operating cash flow against $419 million of net income. That gap is partly explained by the $55 million in robotics exit costs, which included $45 million of impairments, a non-cash charge that reduced reported net income. Management's narrative centers on AI, the AVA and CF segments, and the Elo deal, while the Productivity Plan's total cost of $35-40 million is expected to be substantially completed in 2026. The risk factors describe difficulties from business complexity and acquisition integration, and a global footprint exposed to tariffs and geopolitical tension involving Russia and Ukraine, the Middle East, and China and Taiwan. Readers may want to look at the segment results in Note 20 to see whether the CF gross margin decline persists as Elo is consolidated, and at how the $587 million of repurchases was funded alongside the rise in long-term debt to $2.36 billion.

Catalyst.Growth in 2025 came from the AVA and CF segments, according to the MD&A, which ties it to demand improving from mid-2024 and to the Elo and Photoneo acquisitions. Net sales rose to $5,396 million from $4,981 million, up 8.3%, though organic growth excluding currency and acquisitions was 6.2%. Elo, acquired for $1,303 million in cash on September 30, 2025, is included in the CF segment, and Photoneo, acquired for about $62 million on February 28, 2025, sits in AVA. Management is also exiting its robotics automation solutions business and running a 2025 Productivity Plan that targets at least $20 million in annualized pre-tax savings.

Hidden risk.The most material tension is between revenue growth and earnings. Operating expenses rose 13.3% to $1,893 million, faster than sales, and net income fell 20.6% to $419 million. The effective tax rate rose to 25.2% from 16.9%, and gross margin slipped to 48.1% from 48.4%, which the MD&A partly attributes to tariffs. Long-term debt rose to $2.36 billion from $2.09 billion while the company repurchased $587 million of common shares, and total equity was flat at $3.59 billion in both years. The Beneish M-Score of -2.559 is below the elevated-zone threshold, so it does not flag manipulation risk, but readers may want to look at how acquisition and exit charges are classified.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what ZBRA reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
4.1%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
1.7M
Change since Aug 31
−11.3%
Days to cover
2.9

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against ZBRA. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Short sellers closed some of their bets: shares sold short fell 11.3% since the Aug 31 report.

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 2.9 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Zebra Technologies filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Aug 4, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 4, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 3, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-05-19)0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 12, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-02-12)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 12, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    EDGAR →
  • Dec 15, 2025
    8-K
    Current report (2025-12-09)Item 2.06: Material impairment (write-down)0
    EDGAR →
  • Nov 24, 2025
    8-K
    Current report (2025-11-20)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors0
    EDGAR →
  • Oct 28, 2025
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2025-09-27)Period: 2025-09-270
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →