Xylem Inc.

XYL Industrials · Specialty Industrial Machinery
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$116.73
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$105.29 — $154.27
-24% from high
Market cap
27.7B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
148.0%
P/E
29.0
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Deep value.

Deep Value (Bullish) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Bullish Beneish: -2.49Altman Z″: 3.82Piotroski: 8/9
RED DEEP 100 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.49
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
3.82
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
8
Strong
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) in Xylem’s recent 10-Q, filed April 28, 2026, offers a nuanced perspective on the company’s near-term outlook. The company is raising its total revenue growth outlook to 2% to 3% for 2026, while maintaining its organic revenue growth outlook at 2% to 4%. This forward-looking statement, however, is immediately contextualized by “the current volatility, including due to geopolitical, trade, macroeconomic and regulatory uncertainty,” as detailed in Item 7. The filing explicitly states that the company’s “ability to meet our expectations is subject to a number of risks,” referencing those in the 2025 Annual Report. Furthermore, the filing notes that there have been “no significant changes in the information concerning our critical accounting estimates” from the 2025 Annual Report, indicating a stable, if cautious, approach to core accounting judgments despite the acknowledged external pressures.

The forensic scores derived from Xylem’s financials present a consistent narrative of financial strength. The Beneish M-Score (−2.4946), Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, indicates no elevated risk of earnings manipulation, registering well below the -1.78 threshold that would suggest concern. Altman’s Z″ (3.82), a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index, places the company firmly in the “safe” zone, significantly exceeding the 2.60 benchmark for financial health. Complementing these, the Piotroski F-Score (8.0), a 9-point fundamental strength scan, registers a robust 8 out of 9, signaling strong operational and fundamental performance across its criteria. These quantitative measures collectively paint a picture of a financially sound entity, providing a data-driven counterpoint to the qualitative uncertainties management cites in its outlook. The absence of a Fog Index score, a readability metric, prevents an assessment of the filing’s textual clarity.

Beyond the financial outlook, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” includes a notable disclaimer concerning the materiality of sustainability reporting. The filing states that “Forward-looking and other statements in this Report regarding our environmental and other sustainability plans and goals are not an indication that these statements are necessarily material to investors.” This explicit language clarifies that such disclosures are not intended to create legal rights or obligations, nor are they necessarily considered material to the company’s business, operating results, financial condition, or strategy from a regulatory disclosure perspective. For the forensic reader, this passage highlights a growing trend in corporate reporting: companies are increasingly delineating the scope and perceived materiality of non-financial, ESG-related information, distinguishing it from traditional financial disclosures required by the SEC. It suggests that while such information is provided, its direct relevance to investment decisions, as interpreted by the company, may be limited.

This filing provides a snapshot of Xylem’s financial health and management’s immediate outlook, anchored by robust forensic scores and cautious forward-looking statements. It clearly articulates the company’s current accounting estimates and its approach to non-financial disclosures. However, the 10-Q cannot predict the future trajectory of the geopolitical, trade, macroeconomic, and regulatory uncertainties it explicitly acknowledges. It offers no definitive insight into how these external factors will ultimately impact Xylem’s operations or its ability to meet its revised revenue outlook. The document describes the company’s reported state; it does not forecast market sentiment or determine whether the security is currently mispriced. For that, one must integrate this filing’s data with broader market analysis and a view on the future. Read the 10-Q. Decide for yourself.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • Apr 28, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    Read →
  • Apr 28, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-28)### Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition On April 28, 2026, Xylem Inc . issued a press release announcing its financial results for the quart0
    Read →
  • Mar 30, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-05-14)0
    Read →
  • Feb 25, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    Read →
  • Feb 25, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-02-25)### Item 8.01 Other Events On February 25, 2026, the Board of Directors of Xylem Inc . (the “Company”) approved the adoption of a new share repurchase program. 0
    Read →
  • Feb 10, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-02-10)### Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition On February 10, 2026, Xylem Inc . issued a press release announcing its financial results for the qu0
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about XYL's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →