Xcel Energy Inc.

XEL Utilities · Utilities - Regulated Electric
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$75.12
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$68.72 — $84.23
-11% from high
Market cap
46.9B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
3.2%
P/E
20.4
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Watch.

Xcel's 2025 operating cash flow fell 12% as long-term debt rose 16%.

Caution Beneish: -2.56Altman Z″: 0.84Piotroski: 4/9
RED DEEP 49 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.56
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
0.84
Distress zone
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
4
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The forensic scores present a mixed picture that is best read alongside the cash flow trend. The Beneish M-Score is -2.562, which the label places outside the elevated manipulation-risk zone, meaning the screen did not flag the 2025 figures for a closer manipulation read. The Altman Z″-Score is 0.84, which the label places in the distress zone. For a regulated utility carrying $81.37 billion in assets and $31.83 billion in long-term debt, that reading is a screening signal that calls for context, not a conclusion about solvency; the score is a broad model and does not capture the recovery mechanisms described in the MD&A, such as the electric sales true-up and gas decoupling in Minnesota. The Piotroski F-Score is 4 of 6 computable signals, so the simple checks it runs are mixed rather than uniformly weak or strong. The operating cash flow to net income ratio of 2.02 means cash generation exceeded reported profit in 2025, yet operating cash flow fell from $4.64 billion to $4.08 billion while net income rose from $1.94 billion to $2.02 billion. Readers may want to look at how capital spending and financing needs connect to that gap, including the common equity financing item that reduced first-quarter 2026 EPS by $0.08. In the MD&A, SPS total retail electric sales rose 6.7% in the quarter. Two items are worth tracking: the $37 million Prairie Island refund recorded against electric revenues, and the $22 million Marshall Wildfire insurance recovery at PSCo that reduced operating expenses. Weather was a significant drag, with heating degree days 15.3% below 2025 and firm natural gas sales at PSCo down 25.1%. Ongoing results are management's non-GAAP measure, so readers may want to compare the $0.89 GAAP EPS against the $0.91 ongoing figure directly.

Catalyst.Management attributes first-quarter 2026 growth to higher recovery of electric infrastructure investments and electric sales growth. Ongoing diluted EPS rose to $0.91 from $0.84 a year earlier, while GAAP EPS was $0.89 against $0.84. Ongoing earnings were partly offset by higher financing costs and increased depreciation, and the EPS bridge shows higher interest charges reducing EPS by $0.10. Weather was a headwind: first-quarter heating degree days fell 15.3% versus 2025, and the estimated weather impact on EPS was $0.102 lower than the prior year. For full-year 2025, net income reached $2.02 billion, up from $1.94 billion in 2024.

Hidden risk.The most material tension sits between the GAAP and ongoing numbers and the cash flow trend. An administrative law judge recommended a $41 million disallowance tied to replacement power costs from a 2023-2024 outage at NSP-Minnesota's Prairie Island plant, and Xcel recorded a $37 million non-recurring charge to electric revenues in the first quarter of 2026. Ongoing earnings adjust out that charge and a $22 million Marshall Wildfire insurance benefit, so ongoing EPS of $0.91 differs from GAAP EPS of $0.89. Separately, 2025 operating cash flow of $4.08 billion was below 2024's $4.64 billion, while long-term debt rose from $27.32 billion to $31.83 billion. The Altman Z″-Score of 0.84 sits in the distress zone.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what XEL reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
8.9%
of the shares available to trade
Moderate
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
49.2M
Change since Aug 31
+19.4%
Days to cover
8.1

What it tells us

A noticeable minority of traders is betting that XEL shares will fall.

Short sellers added to their bets: shares sold short grew 19.4% since the Aug 31 report.

Short sellers would need about 8.1 days of normal trading to buy back every borrowed share. A slow exit like that can make a rush to cover sharper.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Xcel Energy filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Oct 9, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 20, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 30, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 29, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 29, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 13, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • May 11, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-05-08)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • May 5, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-05-01)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • May 1, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-05-01)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 30, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 7, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-05-20)0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 25, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →