Williams-Sonoma, Inc.

WSM Consumer Cyclical · Specialty Retail
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$252.03
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$165.51 — $254.89
-1% from high
Market cap
29.7B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
1.2%
P/E
25.8
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Deep value.

Revenue edged up 1.2% while net income and operating cash flow slipped in fiscal 2026.

Bullish Beneish: -2.64Altman Z″: 4.24Piotroski: 5/9
RED DEEP 83 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.64
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
4.24
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
5
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The clearest finding in these filings is a gap between top-line stability and profit trends. Revenue, operating income, net income and operating cash flow all stayed within a narrow band in fiscal 2026, but the profit and cash measures moved slightly lower. The Beneish M-Score is -2.642, labeled below -1.78 and not in the elevated manipulation-risk zone, so this screen did not flag the financial statements for a closer read on manipulation grounds. That is a screening result, not proof that the numbers are accurate. The Altman Z-Score here is the Z-double-prime variant, reported at 4.24 and labeled safe zone, which indicates a low estimated risk of financial distress on the balance sheet; it is not a forecast of future results. The Piotroski F-Score is 5 of 8 computable signals, a middling reading, and the individual signals are not itemized in the data provided. Operating cash flow of $1.31 billion was 1.21 times net income of $1.09 billion, meaning reported earnings were backed by cash generation in this year. That ratio above 1 is a supportive sign, though it does not offset the modest declines in both measures. Total assets grew to $5.41 billion while liabilities rose to $3.33 billion, so the equity cushion narrowed. The filing calls its intellectual property of material importance, citing approximately 220 trademarks or service marks, approximately 380 patents and over 1,200 copyright registrations, with brands such as Pottery Barn and west elm central to its position. The filing also states that regulatory compliance has not had and is not expected to have a material effect on capital expenditures or results. Readers may want to look at the full MD&A results section and the supply chain discussion in the complete 10-K to see how management explains the profit trend.

Catalyst.According to the filing data provided, Williams-Sonoma's fiscal 2026 revenue reached $7.81 billion, up 1.2% from $7.71 billion in fiscal 2025, though still below the $8.67 billion reported for fiscal 2023. The MD&A excerpt supplied does not include the full results discussion, so the specific drivers management cites for this change are not visible here. The available text points to the company's brand portfolio, including Pottery Barn, west elm, Rejuvenation, Mark and Graham and GreenRow, along with a digital-first channel strategy and in-house product design as its stated competitive basis. Management also describes durable, sustainable products as a competitive advantage.

Hidden risk.The small revenue gain did not carry through to profit. Net income fell from $1.13 billion to $1.09 billion, roughly 3.5% lower, and operating cash flow dropped from $1.36 billion to $1.31 billion. Equity declined from $2.14 billion to $2.08 billion while liabilities rose from $3.16 billion to $3.33 billion. The risk factors excerpt flags ongoing global supply chain disruption and intense competition from e-commerce retailers and discount retailers selling undifferentiated products at reduced prices. Revenue is also concentrated in the October through January peak selling season, so a weak holiday period would weigh heavily on results.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what WSM reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
4.7%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
5.5M
Change since Aug 31
+0.2%
Days to cover
4.6

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against WSM. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (+0.2%).

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 4.6 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Williams-Sonoma filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Aug 28, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 26, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • May 6, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-06-18)0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 26, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2026-02-01)Period: 2026-02-010
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 18, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-03-18)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Nov 25, 2025
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2025-11-02)Period: 2025-11-020
    EDGAR →
  • Nov 19, 2025
    8-K
    Current report (2025-11-19)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 27, 2025
    8-K
    Current report (2025-08-27)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →