The Williams Companies, Inc.
WMB Energy · Oil & Gas MidstreamRed flags.
Operating cash flow of $5.9 billion coexists with a distress-zone Altman Z″ score.
The four readings.
What the filing actually says.
The Beneish M-Score is -2.454, which falls below the -1.78 threshold and is labeled not in the elevated zone. In plain terms, the eight-ratio screen did not flag a pattern typical of manipulated earnings, though a screen is not proof either way. The Altman Z″-Score is -0.23, labeled distress zone. This model weights working capital, retained earnings, operating income and the equity-to-liabilities ratio, and it is a statistical screen rather than a forecast of failure. Here it conflicts with positive net income of $2.62 billion and operating cash flow of $5.9 billion in 2025, so readers may want to look closely at the balance sheet, leverage and the debt note before drawing conclusions. The operating cash flow to net income ratio is 2.25, meaning 2025 operating cash flow was about 2.25 times reported net income, which suggests reported earnings are well backed by cash, partly because depreciation and other non-cash charges are added back. Total assets were $58.57 billion and equity was $12.81 billion at December 31, 2025, up from $12.44 billion a year earlier. The Piotroski F-Score and Fog Index are not on file for this filing, so no value is given for either. The 10-Q risk factors incorporate by reference the 2024 Form 10-K filed February 25, 2025, so the full risk discussion is in that document. Readers may want to look at the Rimrock and Crowheart acquisitions, which the MD&A describes as small relative to total revenues and assets.
Catalyst.According to the MD&A for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, net cash provided by operating activities rose to $4,322 million from $3,756 million. Management attributes the increase mainly to higher operating income, excluding non-cash items, along with favorable changes in margin requirements and net operating working capital. Capital expenditures rose to $2,938 million from $1,805 million over the same periods. Full-year 2025 revenues were $14.9 billion, up 17.9 percent year over year, and operating income reached $4.2 billion. Recent headlines report a raised 2026 outlook and dividend as projects advance.
Hidden risk.The tension sits between cash generation and funding needs. In the first nine months of 2025, operating cash flow of $4,322 million did not cover capital expenditures of $2,938 million plus common dividends of $1,832 million, so the gap was bridged with debt. Long-term debt proceeds were $2,994 million against repayments of $1,733 million. The MD&A also notes that a fall below investment-grade ratings could require Williams to post additional collateral to third parties, reducing available liquidity. Commodity derivatives were a net liability of $288 million at September 30, 2025.
What traders are betting.
The metric
Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.
- Shares sold short
- 27.2M
- Change since Aug 31
- +3.9%
- Days to cover
- 3.4
What it tells us
Few traders are betting against WMB. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.
Little changed since the Aug 31 report (+3.9%).
At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 3.4 days to buy back every borrowed share.
How investors use it
- Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
- Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
- Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
- Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.
Quarterly reports
The quarterly reports (10-Q) and current reports (8-K) The Williams filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.
- Sep 10, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 1.01: Signed a material agreementEDGAR →★ Curriculum-relevant
- Sep 10, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials); Item 8.01: Other events0EDGAR →
- Sep 3, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 8.01: Other events0EDGAR →
- Aug 21, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directorsEDGAR →★ Curriculum-relevant
- Aug 3, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0EDGAR →
- Aug 3, 202610-QQuarterly report0EDGAR →
- Jul 13, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0EDGAR →
- Feb 10, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-02-10)No specific items found in 8-K.0EDGAR →
- Jan 8, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-01-08)Item 1.01: Signed a material agreement0EDGAR →
- Nov 3, 202510-QQuarterly report (2025-09-30)Period: 2025-09-300EDGAR →
What the desk read this week
If this case caught your eye
Financial Shenanigans
Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.
View on Amazon →The Interpretation of Financial Statements
The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.
View on Amazon →Quality of Earnings
Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.
View on Amazon →