Wells Fargo & Company
WFC Financial Services · Banks - DiversifiedWatch.
Watch (Caution) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.
The four readings.
What the filing actually says.
Wells Fargo’s most recent 10-Q presents a financial picture that, when viewed through the lens of forensic metrics, suggests a challenging environment. The Altman Z″ — a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index — registers at 0.28. This figure falls well below the 1.10 threshold typically associated with financial distress, placing the company firmly in the “distress” zone. The MD&A’s structure, which dedicates sections to “Risk Management” and “Capital Management” before delving into “Critical Accounting Policies,” underscores the ongoing focus on these foundational aspects of the business.
The Beneish M-Score, a 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, comes in at -2.3856. This value is below the -1.78 threshold, suggesting that the filing does not indicate an elevated risk of earnings manipulation according to this specific model. However, the Piotroski F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan, and the Fog Index, a readability score, are not available for this filing, limiting a comprehensive assessment of fundamental strength and textual clarity. The available data points thus paint a mixed, but concerning, picture regarding financial health.
A closer look at the “Selected Income Statement Data” within Item 7 reveals specific operational trends. For the quarter ended September 30, 2025, total revenue increased by 5% compared to the same quarter in 2024, rising from $20,366 million to $21,436 million. However, noninterest expense grew at a faster pace, increasing by 6% from $13,067 million to $13,846 million over the same period. This suggests that the company’s expenses are expanding more rapidly than its top-line revenue, leading to a more modest 4% increase in pre-tax pre-provision profit.
This reading of the 10-Q, while highlighting specific financial distress signals from the Altman Z″ and operational trends from the income statement, does not offer a complete view of the security’s valuation. It does not account for broader market conditions, regulatory changes beyond those mentioned, or the efficacy of future management initiatives. What it does provide is a forensic snapshot of the company’s reported financial condition and the immediate implications of its expense growth relative to revenue. Read the 10-Q. Decide for yourself.
Filing timeline
- Feb 13, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-02-13)No specific items found in 8-K.0Read →
- Jan 29, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-01-27)No specific items found in 8-K.0Read →
- Jan 23, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-01-23)No specific items found in 8-K.0Read →
- Oct 31, 202510-QQuarterly report (2025-09-30)Period: 2025-09-300Read →
- Mar 19, 2025DEF 14AProxy statement (2024-12-31)0Read →
- Feb 25, 202510-KAnnual report (2024-12-31)Period: 2024-12-310Read →
If this case caught your eye
Financial Shenanigans
Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.
View on Amazon →The Interpretation of Financial Statements
The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.
View on Amazon →Quality of Earnings
Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.
View on Amazon →