WEC Energy Group, Inc.

WEC Utilities · Utilities - Regulated Electric
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$106.04
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$99.80 — $119.91
-12% from high
Market cap
34.6B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
3.6%
P/E
20.6
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Watch.

WEC revenue rose 14% in 2025 while long-term debt reached $18.5 billion

Caution Beneish: -2.45Altman Z″: 0.93Piotroski: 6/9
RED DEEP 49 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.45
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
0.93
Distress zone
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
6
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The filings show reported earnings and operating cash flow both rising, while debt is growing faster than the company's equity base and the forensic scores point in different directions. Operating cash flow was $3.38 billion against net income of $1.56 billion in 2025, a ratio of 2.17, meaning cash generation exceeded reported profit. That is common for capital-intensive utilities with large depreciation charges, but it does not by itself validate every reported figure. The Beneish M-Score is -2.452. Because that is below the -1.78 cutoff, the label places it outside the elevated manipulation-risk zone. This is a screening result, not proof that the numbers are accurate, and it should be read alongside the other evidence. The Altman Z-double-prime score is 0.93, which the label places in the distress zone. Readers should treat this with caution. The model relies on balance-sheet ratios, and a distress label does not by itself mean the company faces default, especially for a regulated utility funding a large build-out with long-term debt. The Piotroski F-Score is 6 of 8 computable signals, meaning six of the eight signals that could be computed were favorable. At year-end 2025, total assets were $51.52 billion and equity was $14.05 billion. The 10-Q exhibit list shows a securities resolution under the WE indenture effective March 10, 2026, and a supplemental indenture for WPS dated January 8, 2026. The 10-Q also reports no material changes to risk factors since the 10-K. Management describes legal matters as ordinary course with no expected material impact, but Notes 21 and 23 were not included in the excerpt. Readers may want to look at the data-center discussion, the CO2 reduction goal, and the Wisconsin public utility holding company law risk, since these bear on the capital plan and the non-utility earnings mix.

Catalyst.Per the 2025 annual figures, WEC's revenues rose to $9.8 billion from $8.6 billion, a 14.0% increase. Operating income reached $2.24 billion versus $2.15 billion in 2024, and net income reached $1.56 billion versus $1.52 billion. The MD&A excerpts provided do not include the full results discussion, so the drivers below come from risk-factor text. Management names data center and other large-scale customers and says the company must develop or acquire generation to meet their demand. Its capital plan and rate case outcomes are also described as dependent on cost recovery through rates.

Hidden risk.The most material tension is between growth and the balance sheet. Long-term debt rose from $17.18 billion to $18.5 billion during 2025, a 7.7% increase, and has grown from $9.98 billion at the end of 2018. Risk factors warn that the company may not fully recover its investment in assets built to serve large-scale customers if those customers need less electricity than expected or if regulators do not approve tariffs. Risk factors also note that financing restrictions may limit subsidiaries' ability to send cash to the parent company for dividends and debt payments. Readers may want to look at how much of the capital plan depends on future rate recovery.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what WEC reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
5.0%
of the shares available to trade
Moderate
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
14.3M
Change since Aug 31
−4.6%
Days to cover
5.2

What it tells us

A noticeable minority of traders is betting that WEC shares will fall.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (−4.6%).

Short sellers would need about 5.2 days of normal trading to buy back every borrowed share. A slow exit like that can make a rush to cover sharper.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) WEC Energy Group filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Sep 4, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 18, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 1.01: Signed a material agreement
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 11, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 4, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 3, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 29, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • May 11, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-05-11)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • May 8, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-05-04)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • May 7, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    EDGAR →
  • May 5, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-05-05)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 26, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2025-12-31)0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 20, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →