Verizon Communications Inc.

VZ Communication Services · Telecom Services
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$44.40
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$38.39 — $51.68
-14% from high
Market cap
184.5B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
6.4%
P/E
11.6
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Fairly valued.

Verizon's 2025 revenue rose 2.5% while net income slipped, as buybacks begin.

Neutral Beneish: -2.67Altman Z″: 1.53Piotroski: 4/9
RED DEEP 65 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.67
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
1.53
Grey zone
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
4
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The forensic scores give a mixed picture. The Beneish M-Score is -2.672, which is below the -1.78 threshold and is not in the elevated manipulation-risk zone, so the ratio-based screen does not raise a flag that calls for a closer read. The Altman Z-Score is 1.53, which falls in the grey zone between 1.10 and 2.60; that is a middle band rather than a clear signal of either safety or distress. The Piotroski F-Score is 4 of 6 computable signals, meaning four of the six signals that could be computed were favorable. Operating cash flow was 2.16 times net income in 2025, meaning cash generation was well above reported earnings. In a capital-intensive telecom business, a large gap like this is often explained by non-cash depreciation and amortization, though the supplied text does not break that down. Balance sheet growth is visible in the annual data: total assets rose from $384.71 billion to $404.26 billion, and equity rose from $100.58 billion to $105.74 billion. The supplied long-term debt series ends in 2013, so the data does not allow a current leverage assessment. The 10-Q also notes that no directors or officers adopted or terminated a Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement during the quarter, and Item 1 states that no pending legal proceedings are currently believed to require material disclosure, with litigation discussed in Note 12. Readers may want to look at the Item 1A risk factors in the 10-K for the full competition and AI discussion, which the excerpt only partly reproduces.

Catalyst.According to the annual figures, Verizon's revenue rose from $134.79 billion in 2024 to $138.19 billion in 2025, a 2.5% increase, while operating income edged up from $28.69 billion to $29.26 billion. The most concrete company-specific item in the excerpts is the Item 2 table in the first-quarter 2026 10-Q: the board authorized a share repurchase program of up to $25 billion on January 30, 2026, and the company paid $2.5 billion upfront under accelerated share repurchase agreements in February. Across the ASR agreements, the company received 50,758,023 shares at an average price of $49.25 per share, leaving $22.5 billion available under the program. The MD&A excerpt provided is mostly controls language and does not include a revenue discussion, so the operating drivers behind these results are not visible in the supplied text.

Hidden risk.The most easily missed tension is that revenue and operating income growth did not carry through to net income, which fell from $17.51 billion in 2024 to $17.17 billion in 2025, a decline of about 1.9%. Net income has also been uneven over the longer series, dropping to $11.61 billion in 2023 from $21.26 billion in 2022. The 10-Q states there have been no material changes to the risk factors in the 10-K, which cover competition, tariffs, cyberattacks and AI deployment. The 10-K excerpt describes a September 2024 cyberattack that targeted several telecommunications companies, including Verizon. Readers may want to weigh the $2.5 billion upfront buyback payment against these earnings trends and against $37.14 billion of 2025 operating cash flow.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what VZ reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
2.1%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
88.9M
Change since Aug 31
+7.8%
Days to cover
4.2

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against VZ. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (+7.8%).

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 4.2 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Verizon Communications filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Sep 29, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 31, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 24, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 24, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • May 11, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-05-11)Item 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • May 1, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 27, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-27)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 6, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-05-21)0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 13, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-03-13)Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 17, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →