Viatris Inc.

VTRS Healthcare · Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$18.22
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$9.92 — $18.43
-1% from high
Market cap
20.9B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
2.6%
P/E
—
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Watch.

Viatris posted a $3.51 billion 2025 net loss yet Q1 2026 revenue rose 8%

Caution Beneish: -3.26Altman Z″: 0.65Piotroski: 5/9
RED DEEP 49 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-3.26
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
0.65
Distress zone
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
5
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The scores point in different directions, and a careful reader should weigh them together. The Beneish M-Score is -3.256, below the -1.78 threshold, so it is not in the elevated manipulation-risk zone. That is a statistical screen that flags unusual patterns in financial statements for closer reading. It is not evidence of manipulation, and it does not clear the company of every accounting question. The Altman Z-Score here is the Z-double-prime variant, which reads 0.65 and falls in the distress zone; this is a statistical screen based on balance sheet and profitability ratios, not a forecast of failure. The Piotroski F-Score is 5 of 9 computable signals, a mixed reading of profitability, leverage and efficiency measures. The balance sheet shows deleveraging: long-term debt fell from $14.04 billion at the end of 2024 to $12.48 billion at the end of 2025, while equity declined from $18.64 billion to $14.71 billion over the same period. Revenue for 2025 fell 3.0% to $14.25 billion. The Q1 2026 adjusted gross margin of 56% compares with a U.S. GAAP gross margin of 33%, a gap driven mainly by $591.5 million of purchase accounting amortization and other related items. Management reports that its top ten products represented about 40% of net sales in Q1 2026, up from 38% a year earlier, which concentrates exposure. The risk factors also tie future revenue to timely new product introductions and R&D programs such as selatogrel and cenerimod. Readers may want to look at how new product growth, the impairment history and the Nashik remediation costs develop in future 10-Q and 10-K filings.

Catalyst.According to the Q1 2026 10-Q MD&A, consolidated total revenues rose 8% to $3.52 billion from $3.25 billion, but only about 3% on a constant currency basis, because favorable currency translation contributed roughly $161.8 million. Management attributes the constant-currency growth to new product sales of approximately $70.7 million, mostly in Developed Markets, and net base business growth of about $34.0 million, mainly in Greater China. Greater China net sales rose 22% as reported and 18% in constant currency, driven by e-commerce, retail and private hospitals. JANZ net sales declined on government price reductions and added competition.

Hidden risk.The 2025 results are far weaker than the Q1 2026 headline. The 10-K shows a 2025 net loss of $3.51 billion and an operating loss of $2.66 billion, and the Q1 2026 MD&A describes a $2.94 billion goodwill impairment recorded in the first quarter of 2025. Operating cash flow of $2.32 billion is positive, so the reported ratio of operating cash flow to net income of -0.66 reflects a negative denominator, not cash generation outpacing earnings. Q1 2026 also carried a $71.9 million write-off from the Nashik fire, an $84.5 million contingent consideration loss, and a $64.9 million loss on Biocon equity shares. The risk factors warn that strategic transactions and new product launches may not deliver their intended benefits.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what VTRS reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
3.7%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
42M
Change since Aug 31
+8.9%
Days to cover
4.7

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against VTRS. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (+8.9%).

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 4.7 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly report & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly report (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Viatris filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Oct 8, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 1.01: Signed a material agreement; Item 8.01: Other events
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 6, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings); Item 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • May 7, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    EDGAR →
  • May 7, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-05-07)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings); Item 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • May 4, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-05-01)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors; Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 2, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-05-15)0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 26, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 26, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-02-23)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings); Item 2.05: Restructuring or exit costs; Item 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →