Ventas, Inc.

VTR Real Estate · REIT - Healthcare Facilities
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$89.30
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$61.76 — $91.06
-2% from high
Market cap
43.4B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
225.0%
P/E
162.4
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Fairly valued.

Fairly Valued (Neutral) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Neutral Beneish: -2.52Altman Z″: 1.61Piotroski: 6/9
RED DEEP 65 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.52
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
1.61
Grey zone
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
6
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

Ventas, Inc.’s 2026 10-Q presents a substantial asset base, with total real estate investments reaching $37,204,594 thousand as of March 31, 2026. This figure represents an increase from $36,170,552 thousand just three months prior, at December 31, 2025, highlighting ongoing capital deployment. The company’s consolidated balance sheets detail these holdings across land and improvements, buildings, and construction in progress, alongside acquired lease intangibles. The MD&A section opens with standard definitions, clarifying that “we,” “us,” “our,” “Company” refer to Ventas, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, a necessary but perfunctory introduction before delving into financial condition. This initial framing sets a tone of formal disclosure.

The forensic scores provide a quantitative lens on Ventas’s financial reporting and health. Beneish’s M-Score, a 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, registers at -2.5217. This value falls below the -1.78 threshold, indicating that the company’s reported earnings do not exhibit the typical characteristics of accounting manipulation, such as growing receivables or declining gross margins relative to sales. Altman’s Z″, a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index, stands at 1.61. This places Ventas within the “grey zone” (1.10–2.60), suggesting the company is neither clearly distressed nor unequivocally safe from a bankruptcy perspective, warranting further scrutiny. Piotroski’s F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan, comes in at 6.0 out of 9. This score indicates moderate fundamental strength, suggesting a company with some positive financial trends but also areas for improvement, as it does not reach the “strong” category of 7 or more.

Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis, begins with an extensive section on Cautionary Statements Forward-Looking Statements. This preamble defines such statements as those reflecting “statements of expectations, beliefs, future plans and strategies, anticipated results from operations and developments and other matters that are not historical facts.” While standard, the prominent placement and detailed articulation of this disclaimer serve to manage investor expectations and limit liability regarding future projections. Conversely, the excerpt provided for Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” offers only a table of contents, listing sections like “Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds” and “Defaults Upon Senior Securities.” This structural presentation means the specific, detailed risks facing Ventas are not immediately apparent in the provided material, necessitating a full review of the filing to understand the company’s self-identified vulnerabilities beyond general cautionary language.

This forensic reading of Ventas’s 10-Q provides a structured interpretation of its financial disclosures and reported health, anchored by specific data points and academic metrics. The filing offers a snapshot of the company’s substantial real estate assets and its approach to forward-looking statements. However, it is crucial to recognize the inherent limitations of such a document. The 10-Q, by its nature, does not predict future market performance, nor does it offer a definitive verdict on the security’s valuation. It cannot fully capture the nuances of the real estate market, shifts in healthcare policy, or the competitive dynamics that will ultimately shape Ventas’s long-term prospects. A comprehensive assessment requires integrating this filing’s data with broader macroeconomic trends, industry-specific analysis, and qualitative insights not present in the document.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • Apr 28, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    Read →
  • Apr 27, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-27)### Item 2.02 by reference . The information in this... 0
    Read →
  • Apr 1, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-05-13)0
    Read →
  • Feb 20, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-02-16)### Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers 0
    Read →
  • Feb 9, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-02-09)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Feb 6, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about VTR's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →