U.S. Bancorp

USB Financial Services · Banks - Regional
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$62.40
Aug 27, 2026
52-week range
$45.02 — $66.08
-6% from high
Market cap
97.2B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
331.0%
P/E
12.5
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Aug 27, 2026

Watch.

USB maintains stability amidst rate volatility, but rising funding costs threaten margin expansion.

Caution Beneish: -2.44Altman Z″: 0.32Piotroski: 6/9
RED DEEP 49 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.44
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
0.32
Distress zone
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
6
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

U.S. Bancorp’s recent 10-Q, filed May 4, 2026, presents a noteworthy signal in its Altman Z″ (0.32) — a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index where scores below 1.10 indicate significant concern. This quantitative flag appears despite the company’s assertion in Item 7 that its disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the reporting period’s end. The document, a quarterly update, largely refers readers to the prior year’s 10-K for comprehensive details on critical accounting policies and risk factors. While common for interim filings, this approach places the onus on the reader to cross-reference for full context, particularly when a key forensic metric suggests a heightened level of financial fragility, prompting a deeper dive into the underlying operational and balance sheet health.

The Beneish M-Score, Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, registered at -2.4437. This value falls outside the >-1.78 threshold, suggesting the filing does not exhibit elevated statistical indicators of earnings manipulation. However, the Altman Z″ score of 0.32 remains firmly in the ‘distress’ zone, signaling a significant probability of financial difficulty based on the company’s reported financial ratios. The Piotroski F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan (Piotroski, 2000), came in at 6.0. While not indicating strong fundamental health (7+ is strong), it also does not fall into the ‘weak’ category (below 4), offering a somewhat neutral signal on operational strength. The Fog Index — readability score; 12 = newspaper, 18+ = obfuscatory — was not available for this filing.

Item 7, the Management’s Discussion and Analysis, largely directs the reader to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, for a discussion of critical accounting policies. Similarly, Item 1A, Risk Factors, states, “Refer to ‘Risk Factors’ in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025,” rather than detailing current risks. This reliance on prior filings for substantive discussion means the quarterly report itself offers limited fresh qualitative insight into potential challenges or changes in the company’s operational landscape. The mention of shares repurchased in the first quarter of 2026, referenced in Item 2, without specific figures or context within the provided excerpts, further limits the immediate utility of the quarterly filing for a standalone forensic assessment.

This filing, therefore, provides a snapshot of quantitative signals and a qualitative tone that largely defers to previous reports. It highlights a significant concern via the Altman Z″ score, which warrants further investigation into the company’s balance sheet and income statement trends. However, the document’s brevity regarding current risks and critical accounting policies means it cannot, on its own, fully illuminate the underlying drivers of this distress signal or provide a comprehensive basis for assessing the security’s intrinsic value. A complete understanding would necessitate a thorough review of the referenced 2025 10-K and other public disclosures, beyond the scope of this quarterly update.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about USB's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →