U.S. Bancorp
USB Financial Services · Banks - RegionalFairly valued.
USB's 2025 profit rose 20% on 4.4% revenue growth; operating cash flow fell 29%.
The four readings.
What the filing actually says.
Taken together, the figures describe a bank whose reported earnings and balance-sheet totals are moving upward, with the main cautions being cash-flow volatility and comparability between periods. The Beneish M-Score for 2025 is -2.444, which is below the -1.78 threshold and is labeled not in the elevated zone. This is a screening tool that compares year-over-year ratios, so a result outside the elevated zone is not proof that the accounts are free of manipulation, but it means the screen did not raise a flag. The Piotroski F-Score is 6 of 6 computable signals, meaning every test that could be computed from the available data was passed; this describes financial strength and improvement signals rather than guaranteeing future results. The Altman Z-Score and the Fog Index are not on file in this dataset, so this synthesis draws no conclusion from either. Company-specific items worth a closer read include trust and investment management fees, capital markets revenue, and the $8,282 million net increase in loans shown in Q1 2026 investing activities. The quarter also included a $35 million net securities loss, against no securities gain or loss in the prior-year quarter. Credit quality context is in the allowance for loan losses of $7,646 million at March 31, 2026, against a provision for credit losses of $576 million in the quarter. Capital returns were material: common dividends were $814 million at $0.52 per share, and common stock repurchases were $277 million. Total equity stood at $66,247 million. Readers may want to look at the full Risk Factors section of the 2025 Form 10-K and the complete notes explaining the January 1, 2026 reclassifications, since the excerpt provided does not contain that detail.
Catalyst.According to the Q1 2026 10-Q income statement, net income attributable to U.S. Bancorp rose to $1,945 million from $1,709 million a year earlier. Net interest income reached $4,263 million versus $4,092 million, and noninterest income climbed to $2,997 million from $2,836 million. That increase was led by trust and investment management fees of $745 million (up from $680 million) and capital markets revenue of $377 million (up from $292 million). Total loans grew to $399,796 million at March 31, 2026 from $391,335 million at year-end 2025, with commercial loans rising to $154,095 million. The excerpt contains financial statements but little MD&A narrative, so management's own explanation of these drivers is largely absent from the material provided.
Hidden risk.The most easily missed tension is between reported earnings and cash generation. Q1 2026 operating cash flow was $1,340 million, a swing from negative $308 million a year earlier, but full-year 2025 operating cash flow of $7.97 billion was down from $11.27 billion in 2024 even as net income rose to $7.57 billion from $6.3 billion. The 2025 operating cash flow to net income ratio of 1.05 does not indicate a large gap, yet the year-to-year cash swings are substantial. Separately, the Item 1A risk factor section in this 10-Q only incorporates the 10-K by reference, and the notes state that certain fee revenue and loan portfolios were reclassified effective January 1, 2026, which may affect comparisons with prior periods.
What traders are betting.
The metric
Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.
- Shares sold short
- 26M
- Change since Aug 31
- +3.5%
- Days to cover
- 3.3
What it tells us
Few traders are betting against USB. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.
Little changed since the Aug 31 report (+3.5%).
At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 3.3 days to buy back every borrowed share.
How investors use it
- Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
- Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
- Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
- Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.
Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement
The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) U.S. Bancorp filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.
- Oct 15, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings); Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0EDGAR →
- Aug 6, 202610-QQuarterly report0EDGAR →
- Jul 16, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings); Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0EDGAR →
- May 4, 202610-QQuarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310EDGAR →
- Apr 23, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-04-21)Item 5.07: Shareholder vote results0EDGAR →
- Apr 16, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-04-16)Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0EDGAR →
- Apr 8, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-04-08)Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0EDGAR →
- Mar 10, 2026DEF 14AProxy statement (2026-04-21)0EDGAR →
- Feb 23, 202610-KAnnual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310EDGAR →
If this case caught your eye
Financial Shenanigans
Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.
View on Amazon →The Interpretation of Financial Statements
The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.
View on Amazon →Quality of Earnings
Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.
View on Amazon →