Union Pacific Corporation

UNP Industrials · Railroads
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$272.70
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$210.84 — $279.70
-3% from high
Market cap
161.9B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
206.0%
P/E
22.4
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Deep value.

Deep Value (Bullish) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Bullish Beneish: -2.64Altman Z″: 3.92Piotroski: 7/9
RED DEEP 100 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.64
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
3.92
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
7
Strong
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

Union Pacific’s most recent 10-Q reports total operating revenues of $6,217 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, an increase from $6,027 million in the prior year period. Freight revenues, the primary component, contributed $5,893 million, up from $5,691 million. Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis, notably directs readers to the 2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of our potential risks and uncertainties. This approach suggests a perceived continuity in the risk landscape, rather than the emergence of new, material threats in the quarter. Operating expenses also increased, with compensation and benefits rising to $1,227 million from $1,212 million, purchased services and materials to $673 million from $631 million, and fuel costs increasing to $643 million from $603 million. The filing further notes common stock repurchases in Item 2, indicating ongoing capital allocation decisions.

The forensic scores presented with this filing paint a consistent picture of financial health. Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector yielded a score of -2.6376, which does not indicate elevated manipulation risk, as the threshold for concern is above -1.78. Altman’s Z″ — a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index — registered 3.92, placing the company firmly in the “safe” zone, well above the 2.60 threshold. Furthermore, Piotroski’s F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan, came in at a robust 7.0, signaling strong fundamental performance, as scores of 7 or higher are considered strong. Collectively, these metrics suggest a company operating with transparent accounting practices and a solid financial footing, at least by these widely recognized quantitative measures of financial integrity and stability.

Beyond the quantitative metrics, the MD&A in Item 7 offers qualitative insights into the company’s self-assessment. It explicitly refers to the 2025 10-K for a comprehensive list of risk factors, noting that these could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and stock price. This quarterly filing does not introduce new, specific risks but rather reiterates a standing caveat that the business could be affected by risks that we are not presently aware of or that management currently considers immaterial to operations. The discussion also touches upon “Critical Accounting Estimates - Environmental,” highlighting an area requiring significant management judgment and potential future liabilities, as detailed in Note 17 of the Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in the 2025 10-K. This consistent referencing underscores the company’s view of its risk profile.

This filing provides a snapshot of Union Pacific’s financial condition and operational results for the quarter, supported by strong forensic scores and a stable risk disclosure framework. It indicates healthy revenue growth and prudent capital management through repurchases, with operating expenses also increasing. However, the document’s reliance on the prior 10-K for detailed risk factors means it offers limited new insight into emerging macro-economic shifts, competitive pressures, or evolving regulatory landscapes beyond what was previously disclosed. While the quantitative health indicators are robust, this reading cannot predict future market sentiment or the long-term implications of environmental accounting estimates. It describes the filing’s contents and the company’s reported status, not the security’s future trajectory or intrinsic value.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • Apr 23, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    Read →
  • Apr 23, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-23)### Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition . On April 23, 2026, Union Pacific Corporation issued a press release announcing its financial resul0
    Read →
  • Mar 25, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-05-14)0
    Read →
  • Feb 6, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    Read →
  • Jan 27, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-01-27)### Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition . On January 27, 2026, Union Pacific Corporation issued a press release announcing its financial res0
    Read →
  • Dec 19, 2025
    8-K
    Material event (2025-12-19)### Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure . On December 19, 2025, Union Pacific Corporation (“Union Pacific”) and Norfolk Southern Corporation (“Norfolk Southern”)0
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about UNP's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →