Tyler Technologies, Inc.

TYL Technology · Software - Application
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$290.75
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$270.71 — $621.34
-53% from high
Market cap
12B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
No dividend declared
P/E
40.2
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Deep value.

Deep Value (Bullish) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Bullish Beneish: -2.84Altman Z″: 5.22Piotroski: 8/9
RED DEEP 100 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.84
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
5.22
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
8
Strong
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

Tyler Technologies’ 2026 10-Q, filed April 29, 2026, opens with a notable adjustment to its financial presentation, signaling a deliberate move toward enhanced clarity. As of January 1, 2026, management elected to combine software license and royalties revenue and hardware and other revenue into a single revenue category, along with corresponding adjustments to cost of revenues. This reclassification, detailed in Item 7, aims to “simplify presentation and enhance the usefulness of our financial statements.” The company explicitly states “no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates” from its prior 10-K, suggesting the underlying accounting principles remain consistent despite the outward presentation shift. This strategic grouping provides a clearer lens on the evolving revenue mix, particularly as subscriptions now constitute 70.0% of total revenues, an increase from 66.4% in the comparable prior-year period.

The forensic scores for Tyler Technologies present a remarkably consistent narrative of financial robustness. Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, the M-Score, registers at -2.8433, which comfortably sits below the -1.78 threshold that typically signals elevated manipulation risk. Altman’s Z″ — a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index — stands at a robust 5.22, positioning the company firmly within the “safe” category, well clear of the 1.10 distress or 1.10–2.60 grey zones. Moreover, Piotroski’s F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan, achieved an impressive 8.0. This high score suggests strong fundamental performance across profitability, leverage, liquidity, and operating efficiency metrics. The Fog Index, a readability score, was not available for this specific filing, thus precluding an assessment of its textual complexity.

Item 7 of the MD&A, “Analysis of Results of Operations,” provides further insight into the business model’s strategic direction. The decision to reclassify revenue categories, coupled with the explicit growth in recurring revenue, highlights a significant operational emphasis. Specifically, subscriptions growing to 70.0% of total revenues from 66.4% in the prior year period is a key indicator. This increasing reliance on subscription-based income streams is often viewed favorably in the software industry, as it typically translates to greater revenue predictability and potentially more stable cash flows compared to one-time license sales. While the filing maintains that there have been no material changes to critical accounting policies, this presentation adjustment itself is a notable disclosure, designed to offer a more streamlined understanding of how the company generates its income.

This 10-Q offers a transparent snapshot of Tyler Technologies’ operational and financial health as of March 31, 2026, characterized by strong forensic scores and a proactive approach to revenue reporting. While the filing provides a robust quantitative assessment of the company’s financial stability and a clear articulation of its evolving revenue mix, it inherently cannot provide a definitive answer on whether the security is mispriced. That complex determination necessitates the integration of external market data, a thorough competitive analysis, and a forward-looking perspective on public sector software demand and broader technological shifts. However, the document does convey a company operating with a degree of financial prudence and reporting clarity that is generally well-received by those engaged in forensic analysis.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • May 11, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-05-11)### Item 8.01 Other Events . On May 11, 2026, Tyler Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing that it intends to offer, subject to ma0
    Read →
  • May 5, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-05-05)### Item 5.07 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders . On May 5, 2026, Tyler Technologies, Inc. held its annual meeting of stockholders. The result0
    Read →
  • Apr 29, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    Read →
  • Apr 29, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-29)### Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition On April 29, 2026, Tyler Technologies, Inc . issued the earnings news release announcing results fro0
    Read →
  • Mar 23, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2025-12-31)0
    Read →
  • Feb 18, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about TYL's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →