Tyler Technologies, Inc.

TYL Technology · Software - Application
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$363.62
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$270.71 — $524.43
-31% from high
Market cap
14.9B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
—
No dividend declared
P/E
47.8
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Deep value.

SaaS shift lifts Tyler's growth and cash flow; transaction and maintenance revenue lag

Bullish Beneish: -2.84Altman Z″: 3.80Piotroski: 8/9
RED DEEP 100 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.84
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
3.80
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
8
Strong
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The 2025 annual figures and the first-quarter 2026 10-Q point in the same direction: a larger share of revenue is recurring SaaS, and cash generation is strong relative to reported profit. Revenue reached $2.33 billion in 2025, up 9.1%, while net income was $315.6 million and operating cash flow was $653.54 million, a ratio of 2.07 times net income. Operating income was $357.68 million, up from $299.53 million in 2024. The forensic scores read as follows. The Beneish M-Score of -2.843 is below -1.78, so it is not in the elevated manipulation-risk zone. This is a screening tool, not proof that the numbers are accurate or inaccurate. The Altman Z″-Score of 3.80 falls in the safe zone, which describes balance-sheet strength under that model. The Piotroski F-Score is 8 of 9 computable signals. Readers may want to look at the mix within subscriptions: the SaaS fee line grew 23%, but maintenance revenue fell 3% as 478 clients converted from on-premises licenses to SaaS. Transaction-based fees rose 6% despite the state contract wind-down. Long-term debt of $599.66 million at year-end 2025 is well below the $957.39 million reported for 2022. The open questions are the durability of payment-processing revenue and the pace of the on-premises-to-SaaS transition.

Catalyst.According to the MD&A, growth is coming from the shift toward SaaS. In the first quarter of 2026, total subscriptions revenue rose 15% to $429.745 million, and SaaS fees grew 23% to $222.356 million. Management attributes this to new clients, expansions with existing clients, existing on-premises clients converting to SaaS, and annual price increases. Overall gross margin rose to 48.3% from 47.3%, which management ties to a shift toward higher-margin SaaS revenue. Operating margin was 16.3% versus 15.8%. Management also expects software license revenue to keep declining as the model moves away from perpetual licenses. Full-year 2025 revenue grew 9.1% to $2.33 billion.

Hidden risk.The risk factors stress cyber-attacks and AI-related threats, noting that breaches could disrupt services and that resulting costs may exceed insurance limits or not be covered at all. Hosting depends heavily on Amazon Web Services, which the filing says has had significant outages in the past, and the company says it cannot easily switch hosting providers. Subcontracting arrangements also expose Tyler to losses if a prime contract terminates. On the numbers, transaction-based fees are sensitive to contract changes: the wind-down of one state payment processing contract reduced revenue by approximately $12.3 million in the quarter, and merchant fees rose $17.1 million. Net income margin also slipped to 13.3% from 14.4%.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what TYL reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
8.8%
of the shares available to trade
Moderate
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
3.1M
Change since Aug 31
−18.9%
Days to cover
3.3

What it tells us

A noticeable minority of traders is betting that TYL shares will fall.

Short sellers closed some of their bets: shares sold short fell 18.9% since the Aug 31 report.

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 3.3 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Tyler Technologies filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Sep 15, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 29, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings); Item 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 29, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • May 11, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-05-11)Item 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • May 5, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-05-05)Item 5.07: Shareholder vote results0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 29, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 29, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-29)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 23, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2025-12-31)0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 18, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →