Textron Inc.

TXT Industrials · Aerospace & Defense
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$75.15
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$71.87 — $101.57
-26% from high
Market cap
12.9B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
0.1%
P/E
14.2
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Fairly valued.

Aviation drives growth while Bell margins and a fixed-price MV-75 charge loom.

Neutral Beneish: -2.50Piotroski: 6/9
RED DEEP 74 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.50
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
6
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The filings present a mixed picture that the headline numbers alone can hide. Full-year fiscal 2026 revenue of $14.8 billion grew 8.0% year over year, and net income reached $921 million. Operating cash flow of $1.31 billion was 1.42 times net income, which is the cash conversion ratio provided in the data. Those are solid annual results, and the Textron Aviation quarter reinforces them. The forensic screens are consistent on accounting quality. The Beneish M-Score is -2.499, which is below -1.78 and therefore not in the elevated manipulation-risk zone. In plain terms, the eight-variable model did not flag the financials for a closer read on manipulation grounds, though a Beneish result is a screening tool and does not rule out problems. The Piotroski F-Score is 6 of 6 computable signals, meaning all six signals that could be computed from the available data were favorable. It tests profitability, leverage and operating efficiency trends, so a high count describes the reported numbers rather than future results. The Altman Z-Score and Fog Index are not on file for this synthesis, so no value is given for either. The MD&A narrative is more uneven than the annual totals. Bell's military revenue rose 25% on MV-75 volume, but commercial helicopter revenue fell 21% and segment margin compressed by 250 basis points. The MV-75 LRIP award could bring a $60 million to $110 million unfavorable catch-up, and readers may want to look at how that adjustment is recorded when the award occurs. On the balance sheet, Manufacturing group debt was $3,466 million, and the company has a $1.0 billion undrawn revolving credit facility expiring in October 2030. Repurchases of $168 million in the quarter, alongside negative first-quarter operating cash flow, show capital returns running ahead of the seasonal cash build. Readers may want to compare later quarters' operating cash flow with the full-year expectation management has stated.

Catalyst.According to the MD&A for the quarter ended April 4, 2026, Textron Aviation is the main driver. Its revenues rose 22% to $1,485 million from $1,216 million, with aircraft revenue up $221 million on higher Citation jet and commercial turboprop volume. Deliveries rose to 37 Citation jets and 35 commercial turboprops from 31 and 30 a year earlier. Segment profit increased 26% to $154 million. Bell's military aircraft and support revenues grew 25%, led by MV-75 volume, and Industrial segment profit rose 33% on manufacturing efficiencies. Full-year fiscal 2026 revenue was $14.8 billion, up 8.0% year over year.

Hidden risk.The most material tension sits in Bell. Its segment profit fell 20% to $72 million, and its profit margin dropped to 6.7% from 9.2%, as commercial helicopter revenue fell 21% on fewer deliveries (20 versus 29). Management expects to record an unfavorable cumulative catch-up adjustment of $60 million to $110 million when the MV-75 long-lead LRIP phase is awarded, expected in late 2026 or early 2027. That phase is largely fixed price. Separately, Manufacturing group operating cash flow was negative $107 million in the first quarter, and net debt to capital rose to 20% from 17%.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what TXT reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
5.5%
of the shares available to trade
Moderate
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
8.2M
Change since Aug 31
+7.8%
Days to cover
4.3

What it tells us

A noticeable minority of traders is betting that TXT shares will fall.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (+7.8%).

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 4.3 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Textron filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Jul 28, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 28, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • May 1, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-29)Item 5.07: Shareholder vote results0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 30, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-04-04)Period: 2026-04-040
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 30, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-30)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings); Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials); Item 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 5, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-04-29)0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 11, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2026-01-03)Period: 2026-01-030
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 2, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-01-30)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors0
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →