Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.

TTWO Communication Services · Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$247.15
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$187.63 — $264.79
-7% from high
Market cap
45.9B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
No dividend declared
P/E
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Fairly valued.

Fairly Valued (Neutral) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Neutral Beneish: -4.99Altman Z″: 1.32Piotroski: 3/9Fog: 14.7
RED DEEP 62 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-4.99
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
1.32
Grey zone
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
3
Weak fundamentals
0 threshold 6+ 9
Fog Index MD&A readability
14.67
Dense
8 threshold ≥ 18 = murky 24
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

Take-Two Interactive Software’s latest 10-Q, filed February 4, 2026, presents an MD&A that largely introduces the company’s business, noting it is a leading developer, publisher, and marketer of interactive entertainment for consumers globally. This introductory tone, which describes operations principally through Rockstar Games, 2K, and Zynga, provides a high-level overview of products designed for console, mobile, and PC platforms. The MD&A frames itself as assisting readers in understanding financial condition and results, yet its initial content is primarily descriptive rather than analytical, focusing on the “Overview Our Business” section. This approach sets a generic stage before any specific financial details emerge, which can be a subtle signal in itself. For instance, the document explicitly states that “All figures are in millions, except per share amounts or as otherwise noted,” a standard but unrevealing detail that precedes any substantive discussion of financial performance.

The forensic scores derived from the filing offer a more granular perspective. The Beneish M-Score, Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, registers at -4.9892, which does not indicate an elevated risk of earnings manipulation (threshold >-1.78). However, Altman’s Z″, Altman’s 1968 bankruptcy-distress index, stands at 1.32. This places the company squarely in the “grey zone” (1.10–2.60), suggesting neither clear financial safety nor imminent distress. More concerning is the Piotroski F-Score, Piotroski’s 2000 nine-point fundamental strength scan, which scores a weak 3.0 out of 9. This low score suggests fundamental deterioration, flagging concerns across profitability, leverage, liquidity, and operating efficiency. The Fog Index, a readability score where 12 equals newspaper and 18+ is obfuscatory, is 14.67, indicating the document is reasonably comprehensible.

While the MD&A provides a high-level overview of the business, the financial statements embedded within the Item 1A Risk Factors section offer more specific data points. For instance, the balance sheet reveals that cash and cash equivalents increased from $1,456.1 million at March 31, 2025, to $2,160.0 million by December 31, 2025. This significant increase in cash, while seemingly positive, warrants further investigation into its sources, such as operating cash flows, financing activities, or asset sales, which are not detailed in the provided excerpts. Concurrently, accounts receivable, net, also saw an increase from $771.1 million to $824.1 million over the same nine-month period. A rising accounts receivable balance, particularly when growing faster than revenue (which is not provided here), can sometimes signal potential issues with revenue recognition or collection efficiency, factors often scrutinized by forensic accountants.

This 10-Q, while providing a snapshot of Take-Two’s financial health and the basis for its forensic scores, does not offer a predictive outlook on its market performance. The filing describes the company’s reported financial condition as of December 31, 2025, and outlines its business model, but it cannot forecast future product success, competitive shifts, or broader consumer spending trends in the interactive entertainment sector. The Piotroski F-Score of 3.0 suggests fundamental challenges, and the Altman Z″ in the grey zone indicates caution, but these are backward-looking metrics. A comprehensive assessment would require analyzing the company’s future game pipeline, marketing strategies, and the evolving landscape of digital distribution, none of which are detailed in this specific filing beyond the general business description. This document is for understanding reported financial condition, not for forecasting the next hit title.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • Feb 4, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    Read →
  • Feb 3, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-02-03)### Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition On February 3, 2026 , Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc . (the “Company”) issued a press release an0
    Read →
  • Nov 6, 2025
    8-K
    Material event (2025-11-06)### Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition On November 6, 2025 , Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc . (the “Company”) issued a press release an0
    Read →
  • Sep 19, 2025
    8-K
    Material event (2025-09-18)### Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers 0
    Read →
  • Jul 28, 2025
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2025-03-31)0
    Read →
  • May 20, 2025
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-03-31)Period: 2025-03-310
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about TTWO's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →