Targa Resources Corp.
TRGP Energy · Oil & Gas MidstreamWatch.
Watch (Caution) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.
The four readings.
What the filing actually says.
Targa Resources Corp.’s latest 10-Q presents a mixed financial picture, notably with an Altman Z″ — a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index — registering 1.0. This score places the company firmly within the distress zone, a signal for further scrutiny. The Beneish M-Score — Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector — came in at -3.1551, which does not suggest elevated risk of earnings manipulation. Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) notes a significant decrease in commodity sales reflected lower NGL, natural gas and condensate prices ($1,064.2 million), partially offset by increased volumes and hedging benefits.
The forensic scores offer a more granular view. The Beneish M-Score of -3.1551 sits well below the -1.78 threshold, indicating that the accounting choices are not currently flagging for manipulation risk. However, the Altman Z″ of 1.0 is a more immediate concern, falling below the 1.10 mark that separates the “grey” zone from “distress.” This suggests a heightened probability of financial difficulty based on traditional solvency metrics. The Piotroski F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan, registered 6.0, which is a moderate score, not indicating severe fundamental weakness (which would be below 4).
Within the MD&A, the company highlights that some percentage changes are considered not meaningful due to low denominators, which can obscure underlying trends. This disclosure, while transparent, necessitates careful reading to avoid misinterpreting reported shifts. The decrease in commodity sales, driven by lower prices, was somewhat mitigated by higher NGL, natural gas, and condensate volumes, alongside a $47.5 million favorable impact from hedges. Meanwhile, an increase in fees from midstream services, primarily from higher gas gathering and processing, was partially offset by lower export volumes.
This filing provides a snapshot of Targa’s financial health as of March 31, 2026, offering insights into the impact of commodity price fluctuations and operational volumes. It clearly flags a significant solvency concern via the Altman Z″ score. What the filing cannot provide, however, is a forecast for future commodity prices, the effectiveness of long-term hedging strategies, or the broader macroeconomic environment’s influence on midstream demand. It is a document for understanding the present state and immediate challenges, not a crystal ball for future performance.
Filing timeline
- May 7, 202610-QQuarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310Read →
- May 7, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-05-07)### Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition . On May 7, 2026, Targa Resources Corp. (the “Company”) issued a press release regarding its financi0Read →
- Mar 26, 2026DEF 14AProxy statement (2026-05-21)0Read →
- Mar 2, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-03-02)### Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement . On March 2, 2026, Targa Resources Corp. (the “Company”), along with certain of its subsidiaries (the 0Read →
- Feb 26, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-02-25)### Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure . On February 25, 2026, Targa Resources Corp. (the “Company”) issued a news release announcing the pricing of the Offerin0Read →
- Feb 19, 202610-KAnnual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310Read →
If this case caught your eye
Financial Shenanigans
Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.
View on Amazon →The Interpretation of Financial Statements
The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.
View on Amazon →Quality of Earnings
Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.
View on Amazon →