Texas Pacific Land Corporation

TPL Energy · Oil & Gas E&P
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$369.71
Aug 27, 2026
52-week range
$269.23 — $547.20
-32% from high
Market cap
25.5B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
65.0%
P/E
47.2
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Aug 27, 2026

Deep value.

S&P 500 inclusion drives speculative premium despite massive disconnect from fundamental intrinsic value.

Bullish Beneish: -2.49Altman Z″: 104.52Piotroski: 4/9
RED DEEP 83 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.49
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
104.52
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
4
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

Texas Pacific Land Corporation’s latest 10-Q presents a concise narrative, particularly in its Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) — the section where management explains financial results and condition. The MD&A refers readers to the prior annual report for detailed information, noting no material changes in the information related to market risk since then. This brevity contrasts with the balance sheet, which shows cash and cash equivalents increasing from $144,809 thousand at December 31, 2025, to $247,571 thousand by March 31, 2026.

The forensic scores paint a picture of financial robustness. Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, the M-Score, registers at -2.4933, well below the -1.78 threshold that signals elevated manipulation risk. Altman’s Z″ — a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index — stands at 104.52, indicating a very low probability of financial distress, significantly above the 2.60 “safe” threshold. Piotroski’s F-Score, a 2000 9-point fundamental strength scan, is 4.0, which, while not in the “strong” category (7+), does not signal fundamental weakness (below 4).

The MD&A section itself is notably brief, directing readers to the 2025 Annual Report for “Recent Accounting Pronouncements” and confirming no material changes in the information related to market risk. This suggests a quarter without significant new developments warranting extensive discussion from management. The filing also notes the “Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures” by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, a routine but essential attestation to the reliability of the reported financial information.

This filing describes a company with strong financial health metrics and a stable, if succinct, quarterly update. The significant increase in cash and cash equivalents is a notable balance sheet development, though the MD&A offers limited direct explanation for its drivers beyond the general operational context of the business. The filing does not, however, provide a detailed forward-looking operational outlook or specific insights into the broader energy market dynamics that might influence future performance.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about TPL's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →