T-Mobile US, Inc.

TMUS Communication Services · Telecom Services
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$157.03
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$147.90 — $230.54
-32% from high
Market cap
168.4B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
3.0%
P/E
16.4
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Fairly valued.

Operating income rose in 2025 while debt and fiber joint-venture commitments kept growing.

Neutral Beneish: -2.76Altman Z″: 1.26Piotroski: 6/9
RED DEEP 65 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.76
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
1.26
Grey zone
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
6
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The filings show a company growing its top line and operating cash generation while carrying more debt and integration obligations. Operating cash flow was $27.95 billion in 2025 versus $22.29 billion in 2024, and that cash flow was 2.54 times net income of $10.99 billion, a ratio that suggests reported earnings are backed by cash. Still, net income declined, so the cash conversion reading does not settle the question of earnings quality on its own. The forensic scores point in different directions. The Beneish M-Score of -2.758 sits below the -1.78 threshold, and its label places it outside the elevated manipulation-risk zone; that is a screening result, not a guarantee of clean accounting. The Altman Z-Score of 1.26 falls in the grey zone between 1.10 and 2.60, a range that calls for attention to balance sheet strength given the rise in long-term debt. The Piotroski F-Score is 6 of 8 computable signals, a count of quality checks passed. The Fog Index is not on file for this company, so no readability measure is reported here. The most specific forward items in the MD&A are the UScellular integration, targeted at $1.2 billion in run-rate synergies and substantially complete by the end of fiscal 2027; the Metronet joint venture, into which $4.6 billion was invested in the third quarter of 2025 with no further contributions anticipated; and the Lumos venture, which requires roughly $500 million more between 2027 and 2028. Readers may want to look at how the Network Restructuring Initiative, begun in the fourth quarter of 2025 to shut down low-value cell sites, translates into lower operating costs in future filings, and whether the Wren House and Oak Hill joint ventures close on their stated timelines. No news headlines were on file, so this synthesis relies solely on the filings.

Catalyst.Management's MD&A centers on the UScellular Acquisition, completed August 1, 2025 with $2.8 billion in cash transferred, and on fiber joint ventures. Full-year 2025 revenues reached $88.31 billion, up from $81.4 billion in 2024, an 8.5% increase, and operating income rose to $18.28 billion from $18.01 billion. Management expects $1.2 billion in annual run-rate cost synergies once integration finishes. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, UScellular merger-related costs totaled $635 million, compared with $14 million a year earlier.

Hidden risk.Net income fell in 2025 to $10.99 billion from $11.34 billion even as operating income rose. Long-term debt rose to $81.15 billion from $74.2 billion, while equity fell to $59.2 billion from $61.74 billion. The MD&A puts total costs to achieve the UScellular integration at about $2.6 billion, and more fiber commitments follow: about $700 million for i3 Broadband, about $2.0 billion for GoNetspeed and Greenlight, and about $500 million more for Lumos. Risk factors also cite the August 2021 and January 2023 cyberattacks, which led to class actions and an FCC investigation.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what TMUS reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
3.0%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
14.3M
Change since Aug 31
−16.2%
Days to cover
2.8

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against TMUS. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Short sellers closed some of their bets: shares sold short fell 16.2% since the Aug 31 report.

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 2.8 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) T-Mobile US filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Sep 3, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors; Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 23, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 23, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 28, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 28, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-28)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 27, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-06-16)0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 23, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-23)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 31, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-03-31)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 11, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →