Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.

TMO Healthcare · Diagnostics & Research
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$506.42
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$401.45 — $643.99
-21% from high
Market cap
188.2B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
37.0%
P/E
27.8
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Fairly valued.

Fairly Valued (Neutral) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Neutral Beneish: -2.58Altman Z″: 1.53
RED DEEP 74 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.58
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
1.53
Grey zone
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

Thermo Fisher Scientific’s 2025 10-Q presents a concise narrative in its MD&A, stating no significant changes in the company’s critical accounting policies during the first nine months of 2025. This assertion is notable when juxtaposed with the balance sheet, which reveals several line items experiencing material shifts within the reporting period. Specifically, accounts receivable, less allowances, increased from $8,191 million at December 31, 2024, to $8,911 million by September 27, 2025. Similarly, inventories grew from $4,978 million to $5,745 million over the same timeframe. Furthermore, goodwill, an intangible asset representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired, also saw an increase from $45,853 million to $49,287 million. These substantial movements, while not explicitly flagged as requiring a change in policy discussion, represent significant financial shifts that warrant attention.

The forensic scores offer a mixed, albeit not immediately alarming, perspective on the financial data presented in the filing. Beneish’s M-Score, a 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, registered at -2.5793. This value, being below the -1.78 threshold, suggests that the filing does not exhibit the statistical patterns typically associated with elevated earnings manipulation risk, providing a degree of reassurance regarding reported profitability. However, Altman’s Z″, a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index, came in at 1.53. This places the company within the ‘grey zone’ (1.10–2.60), indicating that while immediate financial distress is not signaled, the overall financial health is not in the ‘safe’ category either, suggesting a need for continued monitoring. Other common forensic metrics, such as Piotroski’s F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan, and the Fog Index, a readability score, were not available for this specific analysis.

Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis, is notably concise, reiterating that no significant changes in the company’s critical accounting policies occurred during the first nine months of 2025. This section also states that the company’s “exposure to market risk from changes in interest rates and currency exchange rates has not changed materially” from its prior annual report. This brevity, while compliant for a quarterly 10-Q filing, means the document does not elaborate on the specific operational or strategic drivers behind the substantial increases observed in accounts receivable, inventories, and goodwill on the balance sheet. The lack of a detailed narrative around these shifts, particularly for accruals (revenue booked but not collected) like receivables, leaves the reader to infer the underlying operational dynamics that led to these material balance sheet changes, despite the stated stability in accounting policies.

This forensic reading of the 10-Q illuminates the company’s reported financial health through established metrics and highlights the succinctness of its management discussion. It confirms the absence of statistical red flags for earnings manipulation, as indicated by the Beneish M-Score, and places the company in a ‘grey zone’ for bankruptcy distress according to Altman’s Z″. The filing also clearly presents the quantitative shifts in key current assets and goodwill. However, a 10-Q, by its nature, offers a snapshot and a high-level overview. It does not provide the granular operational context for the observed balance sheet changes, nor does it forecast future market conditions, competitive pressures, or the specific impact of recently issued accounting standards mentioned in Note 1. Therefore, while it informs on the filing’s internal consistency and risk signals, it cannot predict the security’s future performance or its intrinsic value.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • Feb 12, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-02-09)### Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement . On February 12, 2026, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (the “Company”) issued $1,000,000,000 aggregate p0
    Read →
  • Jan 29, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-01-29)### Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition . On January 29, 2026, the Registrant announced its financial results for the fiscal quarter and yea0
    Read →
  • Jan 12, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-01-12)### Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers 0
    Read →
  • Oct 31, 2025
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2025-09-27)Period: 2025-09-270
    Read →
  • Apr 8, 2025
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2025-05-21)0
    Read →
  • Feb 20, 2025
    10-K
    Annual report (2024-12-31)Period: 2024-12-310
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about TMO's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →