The TJX Companies, Inc.
TJX Consumer Cyclical · Apparel RetailWatch.
Watch (Caution) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.
The four readings.
What the filing actually says.
The TJX Companies, Inc.’s 2026 10-K presents a curious juxtaposition: management’s forward-looking statements in the MD&A are accompanied by a clear disclaimer that the company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any such projections. This stance is notable when viewed alongside an Altman Z″ score of 0.94, a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index. A score below 1.10 places the company in the “distress” zone, suggesting a non-trivial probability of financial difficulty within two years, despite any stated future outlook.
Further forensic analysis reveals a Beneish M-Score, Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, of -2.6692. This value is well below the -1.78 threshold, indicating that the filing’s reported earnings do not exhibit the statistical patterns commonly associated with earnings manipulation. However, the Piotroski F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan (Piotroski, 2000), registers a 6.0 out of 9.0. While not definitively weak (below 4.0) or strong (above 7.0), this score suggests a middling fundamental health, which, combined with the Altman Z″, warrants attention.
The Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) explicitly states that its “projections and other forward-looking statements” are estimates based on currently available information and are “subject to risks, uncertainties and potentially inaccurate assumptions.” The company notes that actual results could “differ materially” from these statements. This boilerplate language, while standard, takes on added significance when the company also clarifies it undertakes no obligation to update or revise these projections. This limits the utility of management’s own outlook for assessing future performance.
This reading of the 10-K highlights specific financial health indicators and management’s approach to forward-looking statements. It can tell us that a prominent bankruptcy-distress metric is flashing red, and that management’s own projections come with a significant caveat regarding their future reliability. What it cannot tell us is the precise impact of broader consumer spending trends or competitive pressures on TJX’s future operational results. For that, one must integrate these filing observations with independent market research and a view on the apparel retail sector.
Filing timeline
- Apr 30, 2026DEF 14AProxy statement (2026-06-09)0Read →
- Mar 31, 202610-KAnnual report (2026-01-31)Period: 2026-01-310Read →
- Feb 25, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-02-25)No specific items found in 8-K.0Read →
- Dec 2, 202510-QQuarterly report (2025-11-01)Period: 2025-11-010Read →
- Nov 19, 20258-KMaterial event (2025-11-19)No specific items found in 8-K.0Read →
- Aug 20, 20258-KMaterial event (2025-08-20)No specific items found in 8-K.0Read →
If this case caught your eye
Financial Shenanigans
Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.
View on Amazon →The Interpretation of Financial Statements
The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.
View on Amazon →Quality of Earnings
Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.
View on Amazon →