The TJX Companies, Inc.

TJX Consumer Cyclical · Apparel Retail
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$151.23
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$119.84 — $170.00
-11% from high
Market cap
167.1B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
124.0%
P/E
29.4
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Watch.

Watch (Caution) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Caution Beneish: -2.67Altman Z″: 0.94Piotroski: 6/9
RED DEEP 49 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.67
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
0.94
Distress zone
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
6
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

The TJX Companies, Inc.’s 2026 10-K presents a curious juxtaposition: management’s forward-looking statements in the MD&A are accompanied by a clear disclaimer that the company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any such projections. This stance is notable when viewed alongside an Altman Z″ score of 0.94, a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index. A score below 1.10 places the company in the “distress” zone, suggesting a non-trivial probability of financial difficulty within two years, despite any stated future outlook.

Further forensic analysis reveals a Beneish M-Score, Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, of -2.6692. This value is well below the -1.78 threshold, indicating that the filing’s reported earnings do not exhibit the statistical patterns commonly associated with earnings manipulation. However, the Piotroski F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan (Piotroski, 2000), registers a 6.0 out of 9.0. While not definitively weak (below 4.0) or strong (above 7.0), this score suggests a middling fundamental health, which, combined with the Altman Z″, warrants attention.

The Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) explicitly states that its “projections and other forward-looking statements” are estimates based on currently available information and are “subject to risks, uncertainties and potentially inaccurate assumptions.” The company notes that actual results could “differ materially” from these statements. This boilerplate language, while standard, takes on added significance when the company also clarifies it undertakes no obligation to update or revise these projections. This limits the utility of management’s own outlook for assessing future performance.

This reading of the 10-K highlights specific financial health indicators and management’s approach to forward-looking statements. It can tell us that a prominent bankruptcy-distress metric is flashing red, and that management’s own projections come with a significant caveat regarding their future reliability. What it cannot tell us is the precise impact of broader consumer spending trends or competitive pressures on TJX’s future operational results. For that, one must integrate these filing observations with independent market research and a view on the apparel retail sector.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • Apr 30, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-06-09)0
    Read →
  • Mar 31, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2026-01-31)Period: 2026-01-310
    Read →
  • Feb 25, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-02-25)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Dec 2, 2025
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2025-11-01)Period: 2025-11-010
    Read →
  • Nov 19, 2025
    8-K
    Material event (2025-11-19)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Aug 20, 2025
    8-K
    Material event (2025-08-20)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about TJX's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →