Target Corporation

TGT Consumer Defensive · Discount Stores
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$156.63
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$83.44 — $170.75
-8% from high
Market cap
71.2B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
3.0%
P/E
16.3
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Fairly valued.

Target's sales and operating profit fell; tariff refund effects remain unquantified.

Neutral Beneish: -2.72Altman Z″: 1.34Piotroski: 5/9
RED DEEP 65 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.72
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
1.34
Grey zone
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
5
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The filings show a company whose reported profit is weaker than its headline results suggest once one-time items are considered. Net income for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2026 was $3.71 billion, down from $4.09 billion, and operating income fell 8.1 percent to $5.12 billion. The gross margin rate slipped to 27.9 percent from 28.2 percent, and the adjusted SG&A expense rate rose to 20.9 percent from 20.6 percent. Operating cash flow of $6.56 billion was down from $7.37 billion, though it equaled 1.77 times net income, so cash generation still exceeded reported earnings. Long-term debt rose to $14.4 billion from $13.9 billion while equity increased to $16.16 billion from $14.67 billion. On the forensic scores, the Beneish M-Score is -2.719, which is below the -1.78 threshold and therefore not in the elevated manipulation-risk zone. That is a screening result, not proof that the numbers are clean. The Altman Z-double-prime score is 1.34, which falls in the grey zone between 1.10 and 2.60, meaning it does not clearly signal either distress or safety. The Piotroski F-Score is 5 of 8 computable signals. No Fog Index is on file for this filing, so no readability conclusion is drawn. Readers may want to look at the risk-factor discussion of differentiation, demand forecasting, reputation, and ESG-related boycotts and litigation, since the filing says negative perceptions have previously affected results. The after-tax ROIC was 13.8 percent for the trailing twelve months, down from 15.4 percent. Readers may also want to weigh how much of the reported earnings base depends on items management itself describes as uncertain.

Catalyst.Management's MD&A centers on four priorities: merchandising authority, guest experience, technology, and team and communities. Net sales for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2026 were $104.78 billion, down 1.7 percent, with comparable sales down 2.6 percent on 2.2 percent lower traffic. Digitally originated comparable sales rose 3.1 percent while store-originated comparable sales fell 4.0 percent. Cited drivers include the Fun 101 Hardlines transformation, the Precision Plus by Roundel retail media capability, expansion of the Target Plus marketplace, and significant inventory shrink improvements that reached pre-pandemic levels.

Hidden risk.The most material item a casual reader could miss is the tariff matter. On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that IEEPA tariffs were not authorized by statute, but the ruling sets no refund process, and management says it cannot estimate the financial effects. Roughly one-half of merchandise is sourced from outside the U.S., with China the largest import source, and new tariffs were announced in February 2026. Separately, GAAP results include $593 million of credit card interchange litigation settlement gains, which is why GAAP operating income of $5.1 billion sits above adjusted operating income of $4.8 billion.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what TGT reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
3.8%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
17.3M
Change since Aug 31
+9.0%
Days to cover
5.2

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against TGT. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (+9.0%).

Short sellers would need about 5.2 days of normal trading to buy back every borrowed share. A slow exit like that can make a rush to cover sharper.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Target filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Aug 28, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 19, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 14, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 1.01: Signed a material agreement; Item 1.02: Ended a material agreement; Item 2.03: New debt or other financial obligation
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 22, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 27, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-06-10)0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 11, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2026-01-31)Period: 2026-01-310
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 3, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-03-03)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 11, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-02-10)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 10, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-02-06)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors0
    EDGAR →
  • Nov 26, 2025
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2025-11-01)Period: 2025-11-010
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →