TE Connectivity plc

TEL Technology · Electronic Components
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$212.99
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$190.27 — $252.56
-16% from high
Market cap
61.7B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
1.5%
P/E
20.9
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Deep value.

Revenue rose 8.9% in fiscal 2025, but net income fell 42% as long-term debt climbed.

Bullish Beneish: -2.84Altman Z″: 4.49Piotroski: 6/9
RED DEEP 83 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.84
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
4.49
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
6
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The filing shows a company with growing sales and cash generation but a widening gap between operating results and net income. The Beneish M-Score is -2.838, which is below -1.78 and therefore not in the elevated manipulation-risk zone. That is a screening result only, meaning the accounting-ratio pattern does not trigger the standard flag, and it does not prove the financial statements are accurate. The Altman Z-Score (Z-double-prime version) is 4.49, which is in the safe zone and suggests low near-term distress risk on that model. The Piotroski F-Score is 6 of 9 computable signals, which counts how many of nine profitability, leverage, and efficiency tests the data could evaluate and passed. The operating cash flow to net income ratio is 2.25, meaning cash from operations was about 2.25 times reported net income in fiscal 2025, which points to earnings that are well covered by cash but also raises the question of what sits between operating income and net income. Equity was $12.59 billion against liabilities of $12.35 billion, and total assets were $25.08 billion, so liabilities grew faster than equity during the year. Other items readers may want to look at include the Richards Manufacturing acquisition completed in fiscal 2025, the change of incorporation from Switzerland to Ireland completed September 30, 2024, which management says did not change operations or results, and the goodwill impairment risk named in the forward-looking statements. The 10-Q excerpt covers the first six months of fiscal 2026 and reports no significant changes in market risk, but its results sections were not included in the excerpt, so no interim figures are cited here.

Catalyst.Net sales for fiscal 2025, which ended September 26, 2025, were $17.26 billion, up 8.9% from $15.85 billion in fiscal 2024. Operating income rose to $3.21 billion from $2.8 billion, and operating cash flow reached $4.14 billion, up from $3.48 billion. The company reorganized into two reportable segments. Industrial Solutions grew to 46% of net sales from 40% in fiscal 2024, while Transportation Solutions fell to 54% from 60%. The business section links Industrial Solutions to digital data networks, including data center and artificial intelligence infrastructure, and to factory automation. The excerpts provided do not include the MD&A explanation of what drove the sales increase, so this attribution comes only from the business description.

Hidden risk.Net income fell to $1.84 billion in fiscal 2025 from $3.19 billion in fiscal 2024, a decline of about 42%, even though operating income rose about 15%. The excerpts provided do not explain that gap, so readers may want to look at the full income statement and notes. Long-term debt rose to $4.84 billion from $3.33 billion, an increase of about 45%. The risk factors list the ability to operate within the limits of debt instruments as a risk. Automotive makes up 75% of Transportation Solutions sales, or roughly 40% of total net sales, and the risk factors cite automotive demand, tariffs, and China's regulatory environment as exposures.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what TEL reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
2.9%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
7.3M
Change since Aug 31
−22.4%
Days to cover
3.6

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against TEL. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Short sellers closed some of their bets: shares sold short fell 22.4% since the Aug 31 report.

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 3.6 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) TE Connectivity filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Oct 7, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 24, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 22, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings); Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 24, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-27)Period: 2026-03-270
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 22, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-22)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 11, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-03-11)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 17, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-02-13)Unknown Item this Current Report on Form 8-K is incorporated by reference in this... Unknown Item eation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under0
    EDGAR →
  • Jan 15, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-03-11)0
    EDGAR →
  • Nov 10, 2025
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-09-26)Period: 2025-09-260
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →