Constellation Brands, Inc.
STZ Consumer Defensive · Beverages - BrewersDeep value.
Deep Value (Bullish) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.
The four readings.
What the filing actually says.
Constellation Brands’ 2026 10-K presents an MD&A that, by its own admission, requires reference to a prior filing for a full three-year financial discussion. Item 7 states, “We have elected to omit discussion on the earliest of the three years covered by the consolidated financial statements presented.” This directs the reader to the fiscal year ended February 28, 2025, 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2024 discussion. The MD&A overview also highlights “Fiscal 2025 goodwill and trademarks impairments,” which management believes are important for understanding operations and future trends.
The forensic scores offer a largely consistent picture of financial health. Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector yielded an M-Score of -2.7427, which is well below the -1.78 threshold indicating elevated manipulation risk. Altman’s Z″ — a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index — registered 2.65, just above the 2.60 “safe” threshold and out of the “grey zone” of potential distress. Piotroski’s F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan, came in at 6.0, suggesting respectable operational and financial performance, falling short of the “weak” category of less than 4.
The MD&A’s decision to “omit discussion on the earliest of the three years” is a notable choice in financial reporting. While the filing explicitly refers readers to the prior year’s 10-K (filed April 23, 2025) for the fiscal year 2024 discussion, this approach fragments the standard three-year trend analysis typically found within a single MD&A. This requires an additional step for a reader seeking a comprehensive, contiguous overview of the company’s financial condition and results of operations across all three presented fiscal years.
This filing provides a snapshot of Constellation Brands’ reported financial health and its chosen disclosure practices. The forensic scores suggest a company with low earnings manipulation risk and reasonable financial stability, though the Altman Z″ sits just above the safe threshold. What the filing cannot tell us is the future trajectory of the beverage market, the efficacy of management’s strategic decisions, or whether the security is mispriced relative to its peers or growth prospects. The Fog Index, a readability score, was not available for this analysis.
Filing timeline
- May 6, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-05-06)### Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure . On May 6, 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. (“Constellation” or the “Company”) issued a news release announcing that it 0Read →
- May 5, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-05-04)### Item 8.01 Other Events . On May 4, 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into an underwriting agreement (the “Underwriting Agreement”) wi0Read →
- May 4, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-05-04)### Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure . On May 4, 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. (“Constellation”) issued a news release (the “release”) announcing that it h0Read →
- Apr 22, 202610-KAnnual report (2026-02-28)Period: 2026-02-280Read →
- Jan 8, 202610-QQuarterly report (2025-11-30)Period: 2025-11-300Read →
- Jun 5, 2025DEF 14AProxy statement (2025-02-28)0Read →
If this case caught your eye
Financial Shenanigans
Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.
View on Amazon →The Interpretation of Financial Statements
The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.
View on Amazon →Quality of Earnings
Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.
View on Amazon →