Seagate Technology Holdings plc

STX Technology · Computer Hardware
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$690.81
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$209.00 — $1,145.00
-40% from high
Market cap
157.1B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
0.4%
P/E
49.7
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Red flags.

Revenue rebounded 38.9%, but negative equity and an elevated Beneish screen warrant a closer read.

Bearish Beneish: -1.48Altman Z″: -0.96Piotroski: 6/9
RED DEEP 23 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-1.48
High manipulation likelihood
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
-0.96
Distress zone
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
6
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The forensic picture is mixed and worth reading slowly. The Beneish M-Score is -1.484, which is above -1.78 and therefore in the elevated manipulation-risk zone. The Beneish model is a screening formula that combines several year-over-year ratios, such as receivables, gross margin, asset quality, depreciation and leverage, into one number. An elevated reading is a flag for closer review of the underlying line items, not evidence that anything improper happened. The Altman Z″-Score is -0.96, in the distress zone. This model weighs working capital, retained earnings, operating earnings and equity against liabilities, and the negative stockholders' equity is one input that pushes the reading down. It is a financial stress screen, not a default forecast, and the label does not flag the company as a bank or financial firm. The Piotroski F-Score is 6 of 7 computable signals, a checklist of profitability, leverage and efficiency tests, so most of the measurable signals point in the favorable direction even though the balance-sheet screens do not. The operating cash flow to net income ratio of 0.74 means FY2025 operating cash flow of $1.08 billion trailed net income of $1.47 billion. The excerpt does not explain that gap, so readers may want to look at the cash flow statement and its reconciliation to net income. The 10-Q adds specifics: a $281 million portfolio of money market funds, time deposits and certificates of deposit at a 3.58% average rate, foreign currency forward contracts with a $214 million total notional amount, and a Total Return Swap the company entered into to offset equity market exposure in its non-qualified deferred compensation plan, the SDCP. The risk factors also cite cancelled supplier purchase commitments and dependence on large hyperscale customers. Legal matters are referenced to Note 11 of the 10-Q, which is not included in this excerpt, so readers may want to look at that note directly.

Catalyst.According to the FY2025 10-K data, revenue rose to $9.1 billion from $6.55 billion in fiscal 2024, a 38.9% year-over-year increase, and operating income reached $1.89 billion versus $452 million. The business description ties demand to mass capacity storage for hyperscale data centers, clouds and AI workloads, with hard disk drives as the principal product. Operating cash flow rose to $1.08 billion from $918 million. The April 2026 10-Q excerpt is mostly market-risk and controls disclosure rather than a demand narrative, so the most recent quarter's business drivers are less visible in the text provided.

Hidden risk.The most material tension is the balance sheet. Stockholders' equity was negative at -$453 million in FY2025, after -$1.49 billion in FY2024 and -$1.2 billion in FY2023, and total liabilities of $8.48 billion exceeded total assets of $8.02 billion. Long-term debt was $5 billion. The 10-Q interest rate table shows fixed-rate debt principal of $3,905 million, with average rates of 7.14% for 2030 maturities and 7.31% for maturities thereafter. The risk factors state the company may not generate sufficient cash flows to service its indebtedness and continue its quarterly dividend.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what STX reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
3.1%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
7M
Change since Aug 31
−17.8%
Days to cover
1.9

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against STX. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Short sellers closed some of their bets: shares sold short fell 17.8% since the Aug 31 report.

At normal trading volume, short sellers could buy back every borrowed share in under two days.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual reports, quarterly report & proxy statement

The annual reports (10-K), quarterly report (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Seagate Technology filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Sep 9, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 3.02: Unregistered sale of shares; Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials); Item 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 4, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 4, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 28, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings); Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0
    EDGAR →
  • May 6, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-05-05)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 29, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-04-03)Period: 2026-04-030
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 28, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-28)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings); Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 19, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-02-17)Item 3.02: Unregistered sale of shares; Item 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 9, 2025
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2025-06-27)0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 1, 2025
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-06-27)Period: 2025-06-270
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →