Seagate Technology Holdings plc
STX Technology · Computer HardwareRed flags.
Revenue rebounded 38.9%, but negative equity and an elevated Beneish screen warrant a closer read.
The four readings.
What the filing actually says.
The forensic picture is mixed and worth reading slowly. The Beneish M-Score is -1.484, which is above -1.78 and therefore in the elevated manipulation-risk zone. The Beneish model is a screening formula that combines several year-over-year ratios, such as receivables, gross margin, asset quality, depreciation and leverage, into one number. An elevated reading is a flag for closer review of the underlying line items, not evidence that anything improper happened. The Altman Z″-Score is -0.96, in the distress zone. This model weighs working capital, retained earnings, operating earnings and equity against liabilities, and the negative stockholders' equity is one input that pushes the reading down. It is a financial stress screen, not a default forecast, and the label does not flag the company as a bank or financial firm. The Piotroski F-Score is 6 of 7 computable signals, a checklist of profitability, leverage and efficiency tests, so most of the measurable signals point in the favorable direction even though the balance-sheet screens do not. The operating cash flow to net income ratio of 0.74 means FY2025 operating cash flow of $1.08 billion trailed net income of $1.47 billion. The excerpt does not explain that gap, so readers may want to look at the cash flow statement and its reconciliation to net income. The 10-Q adds specifics: a $281 million portfolio of money market funds, time deposits and certificates of deposit at a 3.58% average rate, foreign currency forward contracts with a $214 million total notional amount, and a Total Return Swap the company entered into to offset equity market exposure in its non-qualified deferred compensation plan, the SDCP. The risk factors also cite cancelled supplier purchase commitments and dependence on large hyperscale customers. Legal matters are referenced to Note 11 of the 10-Q, which is not included in this excerpt, so readers may want to look at that note directly.
Catalyst.According to the FY2025 10-K data, revenue rose to $9.1 billion from $6.55 billion in fiscal 2024, a 38.9% year-over-year increase, and operating income reached $1.89 billion versus $452 million. The business description ties demand to mass capacity storage for hyperscale data centers, clouds and AI workloads, with hard disk drives as the principal product. Operating cash flow rose to $1.08 billion from $918 million. The April 2026 10-Q excerpt is mostly market-risk and controls disclosure rather than a demand narrative, so the most recent quarter's business drivers are less visible in the text provided.
Hidden risk.The most material tension is the balance sheet. Stockholders' equity was negative at -$453 million in FY2025, after -$1.49 billion in FY2024 and -$1.2 billion in FY2023, and total liabilities of $8.48 billion exceeded total assets of $8.02 billion. Long-term debt was $5 billion. The 10-Q interest rate table shows fixed-rate debt principal of $3,905 million, with average rates of 7.14% for 2030 maturities and 7.31% for maturities thereafter. The risk factors state the company may not generate sufficient cash flows to service its indebtedness and continue its quarterly dividend.
What traders are betting.
The metric
Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.
- Shares sold short
- 7M
- Change since Aug 31
- −17.8%
- Days to cover
- 1.9
What it tells us
Few traders are betting against STX. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.
Short sellers closed some of their bets: shares sold short fell 17.8% since the Aug 31 report.
At normal trading volume, short sellers could buy back every borrowed share in under two days.
How investors use it
- Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
- Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
- Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
- Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.
Annual reports, quarterly report & proxy statement
The annual reports (10-K), quarterly report (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Seagate Technology filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.
- Sep 9, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 3.02: Unregistered sale of shares; Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials); Item 8.01: Other events0EDGAR →
- Sep 4, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directorsEDGAR →★ Curriculum-relevant
- Aug 4, 202610-KAnnual report0EDGAR →
- Jul 28, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings); Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0EDGAR →
- May 6, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-05-05)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors0EDGAR →
- Apr 29, 202610-QQuarterly report (2026-04-03)Period: 2026-04-030EDGAR →
- Apr 28, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-04-28)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings); Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0EDGAR →
- Feb 19, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-02-17)Item 3.02: Unregistered sale of shares; Item 8.01: Other events0EDGAR →
- Sep 9, 2025DEF 14AProxy statement (2025-06-27)0EDGAR →
- Aug 1, 202510-KAnnual report (2025-06-27)Period: 2025-06-270EDGAR →
If this case caught your eye
Financial Shenanigans
Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.
View on Amazon →The Interpretation of Financial Statements
The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.
View on Amazon →Quality of Earnings
Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.
View on Amazon →