State Street Corporation

STT Financial Services · Asset Management
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$167.60
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$104.64 — $195.93
-14% from high
Market cap
46B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
2.2%
P/E
13.7
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Fairly valued.

Revenue and earnings rose in 2025 and Q1 2026, but operating cash flow swings sharply.

Neutral Beneish: -2.53Piotroski: 6/9
RED DEEP 74 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.53
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
6
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The forensic data gives a mixed but mostly reassuring picture. The Beneish M-Score for 2025 is -2.530, which is below -1.78 and therefore not in the elevated manipulation-risk zone. In plain terms, the ratios the model compares across receivables, margins, asset quality and accruals do not raise a screening flag, though this is a model output and not proof either way. The Piotroski F-Score is 6 of 6 computable signals, meaning all six signals that could be computed passed. Operating cash flow was 4.04 times net income for 2025, which is a strong cash conversion figure, yet the same annual series shows how volatile that conversion has been, with a 2024 outflow that offsets the 2025 inflow. The single strong year should not be read as a settled trend on its own. Management's narrative centers on fee growth and client servicing. The risk factor summary names State Street Alpha, along with wealth servicing and alternative investment management, as product areas that carry costs and third-party dependencies. The same summary cautions that fee revenue may decline with market and currency declines, client preferences and onboarding timing, and it flags pricing pressure and competition. Readers may want to look at the collateral deposit and derivative notes in the 10-Q, and at the first-quarter change in other assets, to understand what drove the operating outflow. Shareholders' equity was $27,742 million at March 31, 2026, against $27,841 million at year-end, while common share repurchases rose to $400 million from $100 million in the quarter. Management also states that disclosure controls were effective as of March 31, 2026.

Catalyst.According to the 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, total revenue rose to $3,796 million from $3,284 million a year earlier, and total fee revenue reached $2,960 million versus $2,570 million. Servicing fees grew to $1,409 million from $1,275 million, management fees to $724 million from $587 million, and foreign exchange trading services to $435 million from $337 million. Net interest income increased to $835 million from $714 million. Net income was $764 million compared with $644 million, and diluted earnings per share were $2.49 against $2.04. Full-year 2025 revenue of $13.94 billion was up 7.3% from $13 billion in 2024. Expenses also rose, to $2,811 million from $2,450 million, led by compensation and employee benefits.

Hidden risk.The most material tension is in operating cash flow. The 2025 figure of $11.9 billion followed a 2024 outflow of $13.21 billion and a 2021 outflow of $6.71 billion, and 2023 was $690 million, so the annual number swings widely. In the first quarter of 2026, operating activities used $12,143 million of cash after providing $2,396 million a year earlier. The largest drags on the cash flow statement were changes in collateral deposits (-$5,682 million), unrealized losses on foreign exchange derivatives (-$4,369 million) and other assets (-$4,650 million). Total assets rose to $392,165 million from $366,047 million at year-end, with other assets up to $78,631 million from $58,468 million. Risk factors also flag that fee revenue may decline with market and currency moves.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what STT reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
1.9%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
5.3M
Change since Aug 31
+13.4%
Days to cover
2.6

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against STT. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Short sellers added to their bets: shares sold short grew 13.4% since the Aug 31 report.

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 2.6 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Quarterly reports & proxy statement

The quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) State Street filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Oct 14, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings); Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors; Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 14, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 12, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 7, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 3.03: Change to shareholder rights; Item 5.03: Charter or bylaw change; fiscal-year change; Item 8.01: Other events
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 30, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 23, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 16, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings); Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 29, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 24, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-21)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 17, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-17)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings); Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 8, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-05-20)0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 31, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-03-27)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →