Simon Property Group, Inc.

SPG Real Estate · REIT - Retail
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$227.56
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$158.00 — $228.58
-0% from high
Market cap
86.5B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
388.0%
P/E
15.8
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Fairly valued.

Fairly Valued (Neutral) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Neutral Beneish: -2.26Altman Z″: 1.80Piotroski: 5/9
RED DEEP 65 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.26
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
1.80
Grey zone
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
5
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

Simon Property Group’s 2025 10-K immediately sets the stage by defining its operational structure as a real estate investment trust, or REIT (a company that owns, operates, or finances income-producing real estate). This designation, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, means REITs generally avoid U.S. federal corporate income taxes provided they distribute not less than 100% of their REIT taxable income. This foundational detail, presented early in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis, frames the entire financial discussion, highlighting the core mechanism through which the company operates and generates returns. The filing further specifies that Simon Property Group, L.P., a majority-owned Indiana partnership subsidiary, owns directly or indirectly all of the company’s real estate properties and other assets. This clear articulation of the corporate and asset ownership structure is central to understanding the entity presented in the financial statements.

The forensic scores offer a mixed but generally stable picture. Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, the M-Score, registers at -2.2574, which falls below the -1.78 threshold, suggesting no elevated risk of earnings manipulation. Altman’s Z″ — a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index — stands at 1.8, placing the company within the “grey zone” of financial health, neither clearly safe nor in immediate distress. Piotroski’s F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan, yields a 5.0. While not reaching the 7+ “strong” threshold, it also avoids the “weak” designation of less than 4, indicating a moderate fundamental position based on profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency.

Delving into the MD&A, the initial focus on the company’s identity as an Indiana corporation operating as a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust is notable. This structure is not merely an organizational detail; it dictates the company’s financial strategy, particularly the requirement to distribute not less than 100% of their REIT taxable income to avoid federal corporate income taxes. This mechanism fundamentally shapes how Simon generates and returns value, distinguishing it from traditional corporations that retain earnings for reinvestment. The filing also notes that Simon Property Group, L.P., the majority-owned partnership subsidiary, directly or indirectly owns all real estate properties and other assets. This centralization of the asset base within a specific operational framework is a key characteristic of the company’s business model as described.

This filing provides a clear structural overview and offers a generally stable forensic accounting profile, particularly regarding earnings manipulation risk. However, the provided excerpts, while foundational, are thin on operational specifics or forward-looking statements that would allow for a comprehensive assessment of the security’s mispricing. The MD&A’s general overview and the risk factors’ administrative details do not delve into market dynamics, property valuations, or tenant health, which are crucial for a real estate investment trust. Therefore, while the filing establishes a baseline of financial health and operational transparency, it does not provide sufficient detail to determine whether the security is mispriced.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • Apr 1, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-05-13)0
    Read →
  • Mar 24, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-03-22)### Item 5.02 of this Current Report on Form 8-K . A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this report and is incorporated herein by referen0
    Read →
  • Mar 5, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-03-05)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Feb 25, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    Read →
  • Feb 5, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-02-05)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Nov 6, 2025
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2025-09-30)Period: 2025-09-300
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about SPG's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →