Synopsys, Inc.
SNPS Technology · Software - InfrastructureWatch.
Watch (Caution) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.
The four readings.
What the filing actually says.
Synopsys’s latest 10-Q, filed February 25, 2026, presents a management discussion that foregrounds the pervasive influence of macroeconomic factors. Item 7, the Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A), explicitly states that uncertainty in the macroeconomic environment may negatively affect the business. This broad framing of risk suggests that external forces, rather than internal operational specifics, are a primary concern for the company. The report period ending January 31, 2026, reflects a period where such uncertainties are deemed significant enough to warrant a prominent position in the disclosure, potentially impacting financial condition and operating results.
The forensic scores offer a nuanced perspective. Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector yields a score of -1.8885, which is below the -1.78 threshold, suggesting no elevated risk of earnings manipulation. Altman’s Z″ — a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index — registers a robust 3.58, well above the 2.60 “safe” threshold, indicating low financial distress probability. However, Piotroski’s F-Score, a 2000 9-point fundamental strength scan, comes in at 3.0. This score falls below the “weak” threshold of 4, signaling potential underlying fundamental weaknesses, despite the more favorable manipulation and distress indicators. The Fog Index, a readability score, is not available for this filing.
Delving into Item 7, the MD&A elaborates on these broad risks, noting that the occurrence of any identified or even presently unknown risks could materially and adversely affect our business. This general disclaimer, while standard, underscores management’s acknowledgment of a wide spectrum of potential threats, including those related to the semiconductor and electronics industries. The emphasis on “industry risks” and the macroeconomic environment suggests that the company views its fate as heavily tied to broader market conditions, rather than specific competitive advantages or operational efficiencies. Such pervasive external risks are inherently challenging to quantify or mitigate, making them a significant consideration for stakeholders.
This 10-Q provides a snapshot of Synopsys’s financial posture as of January 31, 2026, highlighting a decrease in cash and cash equivalents from $2,888,030 thousand to $2,129,572 thousand, alongside a substantial goodwill balance of $26,880,889 thousand. While the filing illuminates current financial metrics and management’s risk perceptions, it does not offer predictive insights into future performance or market valuation. The mixed forensic signals — strong distress and manipulation scores offset by a weak fundamental strength score — coupled with the broad macroeconomic risk factors, suggest that the security warrants a “watch” designation. A deeper understanding would require assessing the company’s specific strategies to navigate these industry-wide uncertainties.
Filing timeline
- Apr 20, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-04-16)### Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers 0Read →
- Mar 2, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-03-02)### Item 8.01 Other Events . On March 2, 2026, Synopsys, Inc. (“ Synopsys ”) issued a press release announcing its entry into an accelerated share repurchase ag0Read →
- Feb 25, 202610-QQuarterly report (2026-01-31)Period: 2026-01-310Read →
- Feb 25, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-02-25)### Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition . On February 25, 2026, Synopsys, Inc. (“ Synopsys ”, “ we ”, “ our ”, or “ us ”) issued a press rel0Read →
- Feb 19, 2026DEF 14AProxy statement (2026-04-16)0Read →
- Dec 22, 202510-KAnnual report (2025-10-31)Period: 2025-10-310Read →
If this case caught your eye
Financial Shenanigans
Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.
View on Amazon →The Interpretation of Financial Statements
The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.
View on Amazon →Quality of Earnings
Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.
View on Amazon →