Sandisk Corporation

SNDK Technology · Computer Hardware
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$2,050.39
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$40.10 — $2,354.39
-13% from high
Market cap
303.6B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
No dividend declared
P/E
70.1
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Deep value.

Deep Value (Bullish) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Bullish Beneish: -3.50Altman Z″: 37.13Piotroski: 5/9
RED DEEP 83 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-3.50
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
37.13
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
5
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

Sandisk’s 2026 10-Q presents a curious juxtaposition: robust forensic accounting scores against MD&A excerpts that primarily detail disclosure mechanics. The Beneish M-Score, Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, registers at -3.5049, indicating no elevated risk of earnings manipulation. This strong signal of accounting integrity contrasts with the opening of Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which largely consists of instructions to read other documents and warnings about forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. The initial focus is on the form of disclosure, rather than the substance of financial performance or operational insights.

The quantitative metrics offer a consistent narrative of financial health. Altman’s Z″, a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index, stands at 37.13, placing the company firmly in the “safe” zone, well above the 2.60 threshold. This robust solvency indicator suggests a low probability of financial distress based on the reported balance sheet and income statement figures. It is complemented by a Piotroski F-Score, Piotroski’s 2000 9-point fundamental strength scan, of 5.0. While not in the highest tier (7+), this score suggests a reasonable balance of profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency, avoiding the “weak” designation for scores below 4. These scores collectively paint a picture of a company with sound financial footing.

Item 1A, typically reserved for specific risk factors, similarly opens with a broad disclaimer that this document contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. While such language is standard in SEC filings, its prominence in the provided excerpts, rather than immediate substantive discussion of operational or market risks, suggests a focus on legalistic framing. The excerpt defines terms like “we,” “us,” and “our,” and refers to Sandisk as the “parent company of our NAND flash data storage business.” This boilerplate serves as a necessary preamble but offers limited insight into the specific challenges, competitive landscape, or strategic initiatives facing the company.

This reading, constrained by the provided excerpts, confirms Sandisk’s strong quantitative financial health as indicated by the Beneish M-Score and Altman Z″. The filing suggests a company not engaged in aggressive accounting practices and with a low risk of bankruptcy. However, the available MD&A and Risk Factor passages, heavily weighted toward legal disclaimers and definitional boilerplate, offer minimal specific insight into the company’s operational performance, strategic initiatives, or the unique risks of its NAND flash data storage business. Consequently, while the filing suggests a financially stable entity, it does not provide the granular detail necessary to form a comprehensive view on the security’s intrinsic value or its future trajectory, leaving many qualitative questions unanswered.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • May 1, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-04-03)Period: 2026-04-030
    Read →
  • Apr 30, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-30)### Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition . On April 30, 2026 , Sandisk Corporation (the “Company”) announced financial results for the fiscal0
    Read →
  • Mar 25, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-03-25)### Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement . On March 25, 2026, Sandisk Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sandisk C0
    Read →
  • Jan 29, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-01-29)### Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition . On January 29, 2026 , Sandisk Corporation (the “Company”) announced financial results for the fisc0
    Read →
  • Oct 7, 2025
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2025-11-18)0
    Read →
  • Aug 21, 2025
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-06-27)Period: 2025-06-270
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about SNDK's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →