Sandisk Corporation

SNDK Technology · Computer Hardware
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$1,394.83
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$136.29 — $2,354.39
-41% from high
Market cap
201.6B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
—
No dividend declared
P/E
18.9
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Deep value.

Sandisk swung from annual losses to a $3.6 billion quarterly profit on AI-driven pricing.

Bullish Beneish: -3.50Altman Z″: 3.26Piotroski: 5/9
RED DEEP 83 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-3.50
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
3.26
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
5
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The filings show two very different periods. Fiscal 2025 ended with a net loss of $1.64 billion, an operating loss of $1.38 billion, and total liabilities of $3.77 billion, up from $2.42 billion, as the company carried $1.83 billion of long-term debt that had been zero a year earlier. Operating cash flow turned positive at $84 million, compared with negative $309 million in fiscal 2024. The operating cash flow to net income ratio of -0.05 is negative only because net income is negative; the cash figure itself is positive, so the ratio is not evidence of cash burn. Equity fell from $11.08 billion to $9.22 billion over the year. The Beneish M-Score is -3.505, which is below the -1.78 threshold, so its label is not in the elevated zone. That is a screening output, not a finding of accurate reporting, and the $1.83 billion goodwill impairment recorded in the March 2025 quarter is the kind of large one-time item a closer reader may want to examine. The Altman Z double prime score of 3.26 falls in the safe zone, a rough gauge of financial distress that does not measure earnings quality. The Piotroski F-Score is 5 of 8 computable signals, meaning five of the eight tests that could be calculated were favorable; it is a checklist of profitability, leverage, and efficiency changes, not a grade. Readers may want to look at the debt note in the 10-Q and the tariff discussion in the MD&A to see how the pricing tailwind and trade-policy exposure are described in full.

Catalyst.Management's MD&A attributes current momentum to AI infrastructure demand for high-performance NAND storage, which it says has led to pricing shifts that positively affected the business. For the three months ended April 3, 2026, revenue was $5.95 billion versus $1.695 billion a year earlier, up 251%, and operating income moved to $4.11 billion from a loss of $1.881 billion. Management says it expects these favorable pricing trends to persist through calendar 2026 and beyond, and it plans to invest in high-value opportunities. For fiscal 2025, revenue was $7.36 billion, up 10.4% year over year, but the company still reported an operating loss of $1.38 billion for that year.

Hidden risk.The quarter's swing depends heavily on pricing, while the risk factors warn that competitive conditions, including declining average selling prices and volatile demand, can hurt results, and that the business is subject to seasonality and cyclicality. Pricing that reversed the company's losses could reverse as well, and the excerpt provided does not break out how much of the 251% increase came from price versus volume. Separately, long-term debt was $1.83 billion at fiscal year-end 2025, up from zero a year earlier, and the company repaid the term loan in March 2026 using cash on hand, recognizing a $46 million loss on debt extinguishment. Tariffs are another open item: most U.S. sales are currently exempt, but the filing says loss of those exemptions would raise costs.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what SNDK reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
5.3%
of the shares available to trade
Moderate
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
4.8M
Change since Aug 31
−19.6%
Days to cover
0.5

What it tells us

A noticeable minority of traders is betting that SNDK shares will fall.

Short sellers closed some of their bets: shares sold short fell 19.6% since the Aug 31 report.

At normal trading volume, short sellers could buy back every borrowed share in under two days.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual reports, quarterly report & proxy statement

The annual reports (10-K), quarterly report (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Sandisk filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Sep 16, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 11, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 1.01: Signed a material agreement
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 17, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report0
    EDGAR →
  • May 1, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-04-03)Period: 2026-04-030
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 30, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-30)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings); Item 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 25, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-03-25)Item 1.01: Signed a material agreement; Item 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Jan 29, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-01-29)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Oct 7, 2025
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2025-11-18)0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 21, 2025
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-06-27)Period: 2025-06-270
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →