Super Micro Computer, Inc.

SMCI Technology · Computer Hardware
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$35.09
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$19.48 — $56.60
-38% from high
Market cap
23.1B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
—
No dividend declared
P/E
10.8
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Fairly valued.

Sales surged while quarterly gross margin fell to 6.3%, from 11.8%.

Neutral Beneish: -2.16Altman Z″: 6.92Piotroski: 6/9
RED DEEP 69 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.16
Elevated
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
6.92
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
6
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The filings show revenue growing quickly while profit has not kept pace, which is the central tension for a careful reader. For fiscal 2025 (ended June 30, 2025), revenue reached $21.97 billion, up 46.6% from $14.99 billion, yet net income fell to $1.05 billion from $1.15 billion, and operating income rose only modestly to $1.25 billion from $1.21 billion. The December 2025 quarter shows the same pattern at larger scale: net sales of $12.68 billion, but gross margin of 6.3% against 11.8% a year earlier. The six-month net income decline to $568.8 million from $744.9 million reinforces that earnings are lagging the top line. The forensic scores give a mixed picture. The Beneish M-Score is -2.157, which is below -1.78 and therefore not in the elevated manipulation-risk zone. This is a statistical screen built from several ratios, not a finding of wrongdoing, and a low reading does not rule out aggressive accounting. The Altman Z-Score here is the Z-double-prime variant, reported at 6.92, which falls in the safe zone; it measures financial strain, not future performance. The Piotroski F-Score is 6 of 8 computable signals, a count of simple profitability, leverage and efficiency tests. The operating cash flow to net income ratio of 1.58 means fiscal 2025 operating cash flow of $1.66 billion exceeded net income. That follows a fiscal 2024 operating cash flow outflow of $2.49 billion, so the year-to-year swing deserves a closer read. The Fog Index is not on file for this analysis. Readers may want to look at the 10-Q notes on inventories and revenue recognition, the related-party purchases from Ablecom and Compuware (1.6% of cost of sales in the quarter, versus 2.7% a year earlier), and the full risk-factor section, which was only partially provided here.

Catalyst.Management ties growth to AI and datacenter demand, along with its Data Center Building Block Solutions (DCBBS) offering, which integrates computing, storage, networking, rack, liquid cooling, management software and onsite deployment. For the three months ended December 31, 2025, net sales were $12.68 billion, up 123.4% from a year earlier, driven by shipments for customer datacenter deployments, including a large design win from one customer. Management said some of these orders were delayed from the prior quarter by customer configuration upgrades and data center readiness matters. Net income rose to $400.6 million from $320.6 million.

Hidden risk.Margin compression is the tension a casual reader could miss. Quarterly gross margin fell to 6.3% from 11.8%, which management attributes to competitive pricing aimed at gaining market share and a shift in product and customer mix. Six-month net income was $568.8 million, down from $744.9 million, even as sales grew. Total liabilities rose to $7.72 billion at June 30, 2025, from $4.41 billion a year earlier. Revenue also depends heavily on timing and on a large single-customer design win, and the filing says some orders slipped between quarters.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what SMCI reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
14.8%
of the shares available to trade
High
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
87.4M
Change since Aug 31
−6.5%
Days to cover
2.4

What it tells us

A large group of traders is betting that SMCI shares will fall. That is a strong negative view, and also a crowd that would have to buy shares back if the price rises.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (−6.5%).

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 2.4 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual reports, quarterly report & proxy statement

The annual reports (10-K), quarterly report (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Super Micro Computer filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Oct 15, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors0
    EDGAR →
  • Oct 8, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 31, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 11, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 21, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • May 5, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-05-05)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 20, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-15)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors; Item 5.07: Shareholder vote results0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 20, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-03-20)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 3, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-03-03)0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 6, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 28, 2025
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-06-30)Period: 2025-06-300
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →