The J. M. Smucker Company

SJM Consumer Defensive · Packaged Foods
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$125.93
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$88.25 — $135.89
-7% from high
Market cap
13.5B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
3.6%
P/E
56.7
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Watch.

Sweet Baked Snacks impairments of $961.7 million compound a $1.23 billion fiscal 2025 loss.

Caution Beneish: -3.19Altman Z″: 0.20Piotroski: 4/9
RED DEEP 49 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-3.19
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
0.20
Distress zone
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
4
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

Read together, the filings show reported profit deteriorating sharply while cash generation has held up. Fiscal 2025 net income was a loss of $1.23 billion, compared with $744 million in fiscal 2024, and operating income moved from $1.31 billion to a loss of $673.9 million. Operating cash flow was $1.21 billion against $1.23 billion a year earlier, a small decline. The cash-flow ratio of -0.98 (operating cash flow divided by net income) is negative only because net income is a loss; it should not be read as weak cash generation. The Beneish M-Score is -3.193, below the -1.78 threshold, so it is not in the elevated manipulation-risk zone. Beneish is a statistical model that screens financial ratios for possible earnings manipulation, so this result is a screening outcome, not proof that the reported numbers are sound. The Altman Z-Score variant used here is 0.20, which falls in the distress zone, a statistical signal of balance-sheet stress rather than a prediction of default. The Piotroski F-Score is 4 of 7 computable signals, a count of profitability, leverage and efficiency checks that passed. Balance-sheet changes are notable: total assets fell from $20.27 billion to $17.56 billion and equity from $7.69 billion to $6.08 billion, while long-term debt rose from $6.77 billion to $7.04 billion. The risk factors add context. Management cites integration of Hostess Brands, prior divestitures including Sweet Baked Snacks value brands and Voortman, trade-secret protection for coffee roasting methods and Uncrustables sandwiches, and exposure to commodity and interest-rate movements. Readers may want to look at the Hostess integration disclosures and the Sweet Baked Snacks impairment discussion in the 10-Q.

Catalyst.Management's current narrative centers on the Sweet Baked Snacks segment, which the 10-Q says continued to underperform plan in the third quarter of fiscal 2026 amid a slower-than-expected recovery in sweet baked goods and reduced consumer discretionary spending. Completing long-range planning lowered projected net sales and segment profit for that segment, and management reduced its long-term growth rate and the royalty rate for the Hostess brand trademark. The company also said it is reprioritizing investment toward growth brands outside the reporting unit. Reported revenue growth for fiscal 2025 was 0.0% year over year, so the top line was flat before these later revisions.

Hidden risk.The impairments are noncash charges, so they reduce reported income without reducing operating cash flow, which is why operating cash flow of $1.21 billion can look healthy beside a $1.23 billion net loss. The more forward-looking tension is in the MD&A: the earlier impairment test showed narrow differences between estimated fair values and carrying values as of April 30, 2025. The Hostess trademark is now a finite-lived asset carrying $38.8 million of annual amortization that will recur in future periods. Management says no other reporting units appear impaired, but the risk factors warn that further impairments could follow sustained changes in consumer purchasing or deterioration in macroeconomic conditions.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what SJM reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
4.1%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
4.3M
Change since Aug 31
−5.6%
Days to cover
3.2

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against SJM. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (−5.6%).

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 3.2 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) The J. M. Smucker Company filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Aug 26, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 26, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 17, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.07: Shareholder vote results0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 3, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-02-26)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 26, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-01-31)Period: 2026-01-310
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 26, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-02-26)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 26, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-02-24)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors; Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0
    EDGAR →
  • Jun 27, 2025
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2025-08-13)0
    EDGAR →
  • Jun 18, 2025
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-04-30)Period: 2025-04-300
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →