The Sherwin-Williams Company

SHW Basic Materials · Specialty Chemicals
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$336.92
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$289.86 — $377.77
-11% from high
Market cap
81.8B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
0.9%
P/E
31.1
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Fairly valued.

Sherwin-Williams revenue edged up 2.1% in 2025 while net income slipped and debt rose.

Neutral Beneish: -2.50Piotroski: 5/9
RED DEEP 74 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.50
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
5
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

Read together, the filings show a business with steady top-line growth, cash generation that has run ahead of reported earnings, and a balance sheet that is carrying more debt. The Beneish M-Score is -2.497, which is below the -1.78 threshold and is labeled not in the elevated zone. That means this screen does not flag an earnings-manipulation pattern, though it is a statistical screen and not an audit conclusion. The Piotroski F-Score is 5 of 8 computable signals, meaning five of the eight signals that could be computed from the data were positive. It summarizes profitability, leverage, liquidity and efficiency trends and is not a grade. Operating cash flow divided by net income is 1.34 for 2025, meaning the company generated $1.34 of operating cash for each dollar of net income. That is a positive sign that earnings are backed by cash, though it does not rule out timing effects. The Altman Z-Score and Fog Index are not on file in this data set, so no values are given for them. Balance-sheet detail matters here. Total assets rose to $25.9 billion from $23.63 billion, and equity rose to $4.6 billion from $4.05 billion. Long-term debt reached $9.32 billion, about 2.0 times equity on the figures provided, compared with $8.18 billion a year earlier. The 10-K risk factors describe exposure to construction, housing and oil-related segments, to petrochemical-derived raw materials such as resins, latex and solvents, and to titanium dioxide. They also state the company may not always be able to offset higher input costs in a timely manner, and that its facilities are not fully redundant. The 10-Q Item 2 table shows 1,600,000 shares repurchased in the first quarter of 2026 under a program with no expiration date, and Item 5 reports no Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangements adopted, modified or terminated by directors or officers in the quarter. Readers may want to look at the full 2026 10-Q and MD&A for the management explanation of results that this excerpt does not include.

Catalyst.The data provided shows 2025 revenue of $23.57 billion, up 2.1% from $23.1 billion in 2024, while net income fell to $2.57 billion from $2.68 billion. Operating cash flow rose to $3.45 billion from $3.15 billion. The MD&A excerpt supplied does not contain the results narrative, so management's explanation for these figures is not available here. The 10-Q excerpt does describe an active share repurchase program: 1,600,000 shares were bought in the first quarter of 2026 under the publicly announced plan, with 28,025,000 shares remaining under it at March 31, 2026.

Hidden risk.The 10-K risk factors tie demand to housing and mortgage rates. They state the company has not seen meaningful positive demand effects from the 2025 Federal Reserve rate cuts and expects high rates and inflation to keep weighing on customers in 2026. Raw material risk is also concrete: some inputs are single-sourced, and supply may come from regions the filing describes as less politically stable, including areas affected by the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Meanwhile, long-term debt rose to $9.32 billion from $8.18 billion, a $1.14 billion increase, against equity of $4.6 billion. The 10-Q states there were no material changes to these risk factors, so a reader may want to look at how that debt load is managed if demand softens.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what SHW reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
2.8%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
6.9M
Change since Aug 31
−1.9%
Days to cover
4.0

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against SHW. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (−1.9%).

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 4.0 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) The Sherwin-Williams Company filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Sep 29, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 1.01: Signed a material agreement; Item 1.02: Ended a material agreement; Item 2.03: New debt or other financial obligation; Item 8.01: Other events
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 28, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 28, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 28, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 28, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-28)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 24, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-22)Item 5.07: Shareholder vote results0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 11, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-04-22)0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 19, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 9, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-02-09)Item 1.01: Signed a material agreement0
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →