Starbucks Corporation

SBUX Consumer Cyclical · Restaurants
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$96.88
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$77.99 — $110.51
-12% from high
Market cap
110.4B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
2.6%
P/E
56.0
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Red flags.

Sales are rising at Starbucks, but annual profit fell and China's licensing shift looms.

Bearish Beneish: -2.88Altman Z″: -1.02Piotroski: 5/9
RED DEEP 35 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.88
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
-1.02
Distress zone
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
5
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The filings show rising sales alongside weaker earnings. Fiscal 2025 revenue reached $37.18 billion, up 2.8% from $36.18 billion, yet net income fell to $1.86 billion from $3.76 billion, a decline of about 50%. Operating income fell to $2.94 billion from $5.41 billion, about 46% lower, and operating cash flow fell to $4.75 billion from $6.1 billion. The Beneish M-Score is -2.880. Its label places it below -1.78, outside the elevated manipulation-risk zone. That is a screening result, not proof either way, and it does not place the company in the elevated zone. The Altman Z-Score variant shown here is -1.02, which the label places in the distress zone. This is a statistical screen built from balance sheet ratios, and its inputs include book equity, which was negative at -$8.1 billion at fiscal 2025 year-end. Readers may want to look at the debt and liability schedules rather than treating the score as a default forecast. The Piotroski F-Score is 5 of 7 computable signals, a mixed result on the nine-part checklist of profitability, leverage and efficiency. The operating cash flow to net income ratio of 2.56 is high mainly because net income fell, not because cash rose. The concrete items to track are comparable store sales, the Global Coffee Alliance, the Nashville support office, the store closures under the restructuring plan, and the China joint venture disclosures. The risk factor excerpt emphasizes brand erosion from negative publicity and social media, and the excerpt does not show the full list of risks.

Catalyst.According to the MD&A, the 'Back to Starbucks' turnaround is the current driver. In the second quarter of fiscal 2026, consolidated net revenues rose 8.8% to $9,531.5 million, led by a 6.2% increase in global comparable store sales, with U.S. comparable transactions up 4.3% and average ticket up 2.7%. Operating margin expanded 180 basis points to 8.7%, which management attributes mainly to sales leverage and lower store operating and depreciation costs tied to the China retail assets classified as held for sale, partly offset by labor investments. For the two quarters, revenue rose 7.1% to $19,446.6 million. Other revenues, which include the Global Coffee Alliance, rose $166.1 million in the quarter.

Hidden risk.The most material tension is that part of the margin gain reflects accounting timing. The MD&A says ceasing depreciation and store operating costs on the China assets held for sale helped lift operating margin. The China joint venture closed on March 30, 2026, with Boyu Capital acquiring a 60% stake and Starbucks keeping 40%. Starting in the third quarter of fiscal 2026, reported revenue is expected to fall and operating margin to rise, because 7,991 company-operated stores move to a licensed model. The balance sheet is also thin: at fiscal 2025 year-end, liabilities of $40.11 billion exceeded assets of $32.02 billion, and long-term debt was $14.58 billion. Management plans to use proceeds for debt reduction, but the amount is not in the excerpt.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what SBUX reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
4.1%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
42M
Change since Aug 31
+4.9%
Days to cover
6.1

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against SBUX. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (+4.9%).

Short sellers would need about 6.1 days of normal trading to buy back every borrowed share. A slow exit like that can make a rush to cover sharper.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Starbucks filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Sep 24, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.05: Restructuring or exit costs; Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 29, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 28, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-29)Period: 2026-03-290
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 28, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-28)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 2, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-02)Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 30, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-03-25)Item 5.07: Shareholder vote results0
    EDGAR →
  • Jan 26, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-03-25)0
    EDGAR →
  • Nov 14, 2025
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-09-28)Period: 2025-09-280
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →