RTX Corporation

RTX Industrials · Aerospace & Defense
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$187.33
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$142.66 — $214.50
-13% from high
Market cap
252.3B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
147.0%
P/E
35.1
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Deep value.

Deep Value (Bullish) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Bullish Beneish: -2.38Altman Z″: 2.49Piotroski: 7/9Fog: 17.6
RED DEEP 82 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.38
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
2.49
Grey zone
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
7
Strong
0 threshold 6+ 9
Fog Index MD&A readability
17.55
Dense
8 threshold ≥ 18 = murky 24
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

The MD&A for RTX Corporation’s 2026 10-Q begins with a notable disclaimer regarding its forward-looking statements. The company explicitly states it undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether due to new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by applicable law. This standard boilerplate language, found in Item 7, sets a clear boundary for shareholder expectations regarding future projections. It emphasizes that these statements speak only as of the report date, or the date of any document incorporated by reference. This approach frames the subsequent financial discussion with a degree of caution, reminding readers that actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Additional factors causing such differences are disclosed in other SEC filings, reinforcing the limited scope of this specific report’s forward-looking views.

The forensic scores present a mixed but generally stable picture for RTX. Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector registered a -2.3835, which falls below the -1.78 threshold, indicating no elevated manipulation risk. Altman’s Z″, a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index, came in at 2.49. This places the company in the “grey” zone (1.10–2.60), suggesting a moderate financial health profile that signals neither imminent distress nor robust safety. Conversely, Piotroski’s F-Score, a 2000 9-point fundamental strength scan, scored a strong 7.0 out of 9. This result indicates solid financial fundamentals based on profitability, leverage, liquidity, and operating efficiency criteria, providing a positive counterpoint to the Altman Z″‘s ambiguity.

The MD&A directs readers to “Note 15: Commitments and Contingencies” within Item 1 of this Form 10-Q for a discussion regarding material legal proceedings. This cross-reference, found in Item 1, is a standard but crucial disclosure mechanism. It signals that the company faces ongoing legal matters that could, if resolved unfavorably, have a significant financial impact. While the filing does not detail the specifics within this particular section, the explicit mention underscores the potential for future liabilities or expenses that could affect the company’s financial condition and results of operations. Understanding these potential contingencies is vital for assessing the company’s financial health beyond its reported operational performance. The absence of specific detail in the MD&A itself necessitates a deeper dive into the referenced note for a complete picture.

The Fog Index — readability score; 12 = newspaper, 18+ = obfuscatory — for this filing is 17.55. This score, while just below the 18+ obfuscatory threshold, suggests the language is dense and complex, requiring careful attention from the reader. This reading of the 10-Q provides a snapshot of RTX’s financial health indicators and management’s approach to disclosures. It highlights areas of fundamental strength and moderate financial risk, alongside the company’s explicit stance on forward-looking statements and the existence of legal contingencies. However, it does not offer insight into specific market dynamics, the competitive landscape, or the ultimate resolution of its legal proceedings. A comprehensive view would require further analysis of the referenced notes, a deeper understanding of the sector, and broader industry context, which are beyond the scope of this particular filing.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • May 4, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-30)### Item 5.07 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders . The Company held its 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareowners on April 30, 2026. As of March 3, 200
    Read →
  • Apr 21, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    Read →
  • Apr 21, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-21)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Mar 9, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-04-30)0
    Read →
  • Mar 5, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-03-05)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Feb 6, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about RTX's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →