RTX Corporation

RTX Industrials · Aerospace & Defense
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$186.95
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$156.10 — $226.88
-18% from high
Market cap
252B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
1.6%
P/E
32.9
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Deep value.

RTX revenue rose 9.7% in 2025 while defense-spending dependence remains its key risk.

Bullish Beneish: -2.38Altman Z″: 2.16Piotroski: 7/9Fog: 17.6
RED DEEP 82 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.38
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
2.16
Grey zone
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
7
Strong
0 threshold 6+ 9
Fog Index MD&A readability
17.55
Dense
8 threshold ≥ 18 = murky 24
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

Read together, the numbers and filings show a company growing revenue and converting earnings into cash, with the main open questions tied to government dependence and document readability. Revenue reached $88.6 billion in 2025, up 9.7% from 2024, and operating income rose to $9.3 billion. The Beneish M-Score of -2.384 is below the -1.78 threshold and is labeled not in the elevated zone, so this earnings-manipulation screen does not flag the company. The Altman Z″-Score of 2.16 falls in the grey zone, between 1.10 and 2.60. That is a middle band in this bankruptcy-risk screen, not a clear safe or distress signal, and with liabilities of $103.94 billion against assets of $171.08 billion, it is a band worth watching. The Piotroski F-Score is 7 of 7 computable signals, meaning all seven scored tests that could be computed were passed. The operating cash flow to net income ratio of 1.57 means 2025 operating cash flow was about 1.57 times reported net income, indicating reported profit is backed by cash. The Fog Index of 17.55 falls in the 14 to 18 band labeled hard to read, so the MD&A requires careful reading. The 10-Q excerpt refers legal proceedings to Note 15 and states no material developments, while Note 17 is cited as the commitments and contingencies disclosure. Readers may want to look at those notes directly, along with the Item 1A discussion of defense spending and DoW appropriations, because the excerpt provided does not describe the underlying matters. The company made no share repurchases in the first quarter of 2026 and reported $615 million remaining under its $11 billion program authorized October 21, 2023.

Catalyst.Per the annual results, revenue reached $88.6 billion in 2025, up from $80.74 billion in 2024, and operating income rose to $9.3 billion from $6.54 billion. Net income climbed to $6.73 billion from $4.77 billion. The 10-Q excerpt on file, covering the quarter ended March 31, 2026, contains legal-proceedings cross-references, share repurchase tables, and exhibit lists rather than segment or product-level MD&A discussion, so the specific operating drivers behind this growth cannot be identified from the text provided.

Hidden risk.The Item 1A risk factors state that U.S. government sales constitute a significant portion of consolidated sales, largely from defense-related programs with the Department of War (DoW), so budget decisions, appropriations, government shutdowns, and continuing resolutions could affect results. The 10-Q says there are no material changes from those 10-K factors, so the risk remains in place. Liabilities rose to $103.94 billion in 2025 from $100.9 billion in 2024, while equity rose to $65.25 billion from $60.16 billion. A casual reader may focus on profit growth and miss how heavily the business depends on one customer's budget process.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what RTX reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
1.0%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
13.7M
Change since Aug 31
+10.6%
Days to cover
3.4

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against RTX. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Short sellers added to their bets: shares sold short grew 10.6% since the Aug 31 report.

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 3.4 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) RTX Corporation filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Sep 15, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 23, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 23, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • May 4, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-30)Item 5.07: Shareholder vote results0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 21, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 21, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-21)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 9, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-04-30)0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 5, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-03-05)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 6, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →