Republic Services, Inc.

RSG Industrials · Waste Management
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$214.68
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$196.41 — $246.82
-13% from high
Market cap
66B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
116.0%
P/E
30.8
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Fairly valued.

Fairly Valued (Neutral) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Neutral Beneish: -2.73Altman Z″: 1.09Piotroski: 7/9Fog: 17.4
RED DEEP 70 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.73
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
1.09
Distress zone
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
7
Strong
0 threshold 6+ 9
Fog Index MD&A readability
17.35
Dense
8 threshold ≥ 18 = murky 24
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

Republic Services’ most recent 10-Q presents a mixed financial picture, with Altman’s Z″ — a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index — registering 1.09, placing it in the ‘distress’ zone (Altman, 1968). This figure sits against a backdrop of significant capital allocation, as the company repurchased 1.3 million shares for $292 million during the three months ended March 31, 2026, a substantial increase from $55 million in the prior year period. Dividends paid also increased to $193 million. Meanwhile, the filing notes principal debt maturing within the next 12 months totals $547 million, including finance lease obligations, which requires careful consideration.

The forensic scores offer a divergent view. Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, the M-Score, registered -2.7308, which does not suggest elevated earnings manipulation risk (Beneish, 1999). However, Altman’s Z″, at 1.09, remains in the ‘distress’ range, indicating a heightened probability of financial difficulty (Altman, 1968). Contrasting this, Piotroski’s F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan, reached 7.0, signaling robust fundamental health (Piotroski, 2000). The filing’s readability, measured by the Fog Index, came in at 17.35, which is below the 18+ threshold for obfuscatory text, suggesting relative clarity (Gunning, 1952).

Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis, highlights the company’s debt obligations, noting principal debt maturing within the next 12 months totals $547 million. This figure includes certain finance lease obligations. The MD&A further specifies that most of the company’s tax-exempt financings are remarketed quarterly or semiannually by agents to maintain a variable yield. This structure means that while the company benefits from potentially lower short-term rates, it also faces interest rate risk and the ongoing need for successful remarketing or refinancing of these obligations, which could impact liquidity and financial flexibility given the upcoming maturities.

This filing provides a snapshot of Republic Services’ financial health and operational decisions as of March 31, 2026. While the strong Piotroski F-Score suggests fundamental strength and the Beneish M-Score indicates low manipulation risk, the Altman Z″‘s ‘distress’ signal warrants attention, particularly alongside the significant short-term debt maturities. The document outlines capital allocation priorities, such as share repurchases and dividends, but does not explicitly detail the company’s strategy for addressing the upcoming debt. Determining whether the security is mispriced requires an independent assessment of the company’s ability to manage its variable-yield debt, refinance effectively, and sustain its operational performance in the face of these financial pressures. The filing itself offers the data; the interpretation of its implications for future value remains with the reader.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • May 8, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    Read →
  • May 7, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-05-05)### Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition . 3... ### Item 8.01 Other Events . 3... ### Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits . 3 SIG0
    Read →
  • Mar 24, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-05-07)0
    Read →
  • Feb 18, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    Read →
  • Feb 17, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-02-10)### Unknown Item endments to Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws; Change in Fiscal Year 3... ### Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits 3 SIGNATURES 4 99 0
    Read →
  • Feb 17, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-02-17)### Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition . 3... ### Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure . 3... ### Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhib0
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about RSG's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →