Ross Stores, Inc.

ROST Consumer Cyclical · Apparel Retail
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$234.83
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$154.87 — $257.00
-9% from high
Market cap
75.3B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
0.8%
P/E
28.4
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Deep value.

Sales and cash flow rose in fiscal 2025, while tariff costs trimmed operating margin.

Bullish Beneish: -2.64Altman Z″: 4.04Piotroski: 7/9
RED DEEP 100 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.64
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
4.04
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
7
Strong
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The filings describe a business that is growing and generating more cash, but with cost pressures the headline numbers do not fully show. Operating cash flow was $3.03 billion in fiscal 2025, compared with $2.36 billion in the prior year, and the ratio of operating cash flow to net income is 1.41, meaning cash generated exceeded reported earnings. Long-term debt fell to $1.02 billion from $1.52 billion after the repayment at maturity of $700 million of Senior Notes in April 2025, and equity grew to $6.19 billion. Store count rose to 2,267 across Ross Dress for Less and dd's DISCOUNTS, consistent with the expansion narrative, but the MD&A also notes that interest income declined as cash balances fell after those repayments. The forensic scores should be read against their labels. The Beneish M-Score is -2.644, below the -1.78 threshold and therefore not in the elevated manipulation-risk zone. It is a statistical screen built from year-over-year ratios, and this result does not flag the figures for a closer read on that basis. The Altman Z″-Score is 4.04, in the safe zone, a rough gauge of financial distress risk drawn from balance sheet and earnings ratios. The Piotroski F-Score is 7 of 8 computable signals, meaning the company passed seven of the eight checks on profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency that could be scored. These scores are screens rather than verdicts, so they work best alongside the MD&A and risk-factor text, where tariffs, sourcing concentration, and store-level cost growth are the items to track.

Catalyst.Fiscal 2025, the year ended January 31, 2026, shows sales of $22.75 billion, up 7.7% from $21.13 billion. The MD&A attributes the increase to a 5% rise in comparable store sales, driven by roughly 3% higher basket size and 2% higher traffic, plus about $660 million from non-comparable stores. Management points to store expansion: 90 new stores in fiscal 2025, entry into Puerto Rico and the New York Metro area, and plans to open about 110 stores in 2026. Net income rose to $2.15 billion from $2.09 billion, and diluted earnings per share reached $6.61 versus $6.32, helped by a 2% reduction in diluted shares from repurchases.

Hidden risk.The most material tension is between a rising top line and a slightly thinner operating margin. Operating income reached $2.71 billion, but its margin fell from 12.2% to 11.9%. The MD&A cites a 20 basis point drop in merchandise margin from tariff-related costs and a 25 basis point rise in distribution costs after the Buckeye, Arizona distribution center opened in May 2025. The prior year also benefited from a $61.6 million pre-tax gain on a warehouse sale. The risk factors state that more than half of the goods the company sells originate from China, leaving it exposed to tariff and trade-policy changes that could raise costs. Readers may want to look at how these costs flow into future margins.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what ROST reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
3.7%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
10.2M
Change since Aug 31
+19.1%
Days to cover
5.2

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against ROST. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Short sellers added to their bets: shares sold short grew 19.1% since the Aug 31 report.

Short sellers would need about 5.2 days of normal trading to buy back every borrowed share. A slow exit like that can make a rush to cover sharper.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Ross Stores filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Sep 17, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors; Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 1, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 20, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 7, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-05-20)0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 31, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2026-01-31)Period: 2026-01-310
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 3, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-03-03)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Dec 10, 2025
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2025-11-01)Period: 2025-11-010
    EDGAR →
  • Nov 24, 2025
    8-K
    Current report (2025-11-19)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors; Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0
    EDGAR →
  • Nov 20, 2025
    8-K
    Current report (2025-11-20)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →