Rockwell Automation, Inc.

ROK Industrials · Specialty Industrial Machinery
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$422.03
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$343.81 — $497.36
-15% from high
Market cap
47B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
1.3%
P/E
39.5
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Deep value.

Organic sales rose 8.6% in March quarter; FY2025 net income fell 8.8%.

Bullish Beneish: -2.85Altman Z″: 3.38Piotroski: 7/9
RED DEEP 100 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.85
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
3.38
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
7
Strong
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The filings show a company growing its top line again in early fiscal 2026 while its FY2025 earnings moved in the opposite direction. Revenue rose 0.9% to $8.34 billion in FY2025, net income fell 8.8% to $869 million, and operating cash flow climbed to $1.54 billion from $863.8 million, producing an operating cash flow to net income ratio of 1.78. The March 2026 reconciliation tables indicate that Intelligent Devices (drives, motion, safety, and sensing, including PowerFlex AC drives) and Software & Control (ControlLogix and CompactLogix control systems and FactoryTalk software) are the main sources of organic growth, while Lifecycle Services, which includes the Sensia joint venture, is the weaker line. The Beneish M-Score is -2.846, which is below the -1.78 threshold and therefore not in the elevated manipulation-risk zone; it is a screening tool, not proof either way. The Altman Z″-Score is 3.38, in the safe zone, indicating low distress risk on that model. The Piotroski F-Score is 7 of 9 computable signals, a count of financial strength tests covering profitability, leverage, and efficiency. The cash-flow-to-earnings ratio of 1.78 suggests reported earnings are backed by cash, though it does not explain the net income decline. The Fog Index is not on file for this company, so no readability assessment is offered. Readers may want to look at Item 7 of the 10-K for the reasons behind the gap between operating income and net income, at Note 17 for environmental matters the MD&A incorporates by reference, and at the foreign currency risk disclosure in Item 7A given the currency effects in each quarter. Total assets were roughly flat at $11.22 billion against $11.23 billion, while equity rose to $3.65 billion from $3.5 billion.

Catalyst.In the three months ended March 31, 2026, reported sales were $2,239 million versus $2,001 million a year earlier. Excluding currency effects, organic sales were $2,174 million, up about 8.6%. Software & Control organic sales rose from $568 million to $665 million, about 17%, and Intelligent Devices organic sales rose about 9% to $979 million. Lifecycle Services organic sales were $530 million, about 1% below the prior-year $537 million. For the six months, reported sales reached $4,344 million against $3,882 million, with organic sales of $4,244 million. The excerpt provides reconciliation tables but does not explain the operational drivers behind these gains.

Hidden risk.Full-year FY2025 net income fell to $869 million from $952.5 million, an 8.8% decline, even though operating income rose to $1.7 billion from $1.59 billion. The excerpts do not explain that gap, so readers may want to examine the income statement and notes. Lifecycle Services, which includes recurring services, saw organic sales fall about 3.6% for the six months ($1,044 million versus $1,083 million). Latin America organic sales were $127 million versus $128 million in the quarter. Long-term debt rose to $2.61 billion from $2.56 billion. The risk factors also flag that a strengthening U.S. dollar can reduce sales from outside the U.S., and that emerging-market rules can restrict currency conversion and dividends.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what ROK reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
3.8%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
3.7M
Change since Aug 31
+0.6%
Days to cover
5.2

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against ROK. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (+0.6%).

Short sellers would need about 5.2 days of normal trading to buy back every borrowed share. A slow exit like that can make a rush to cover sharper.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Rockwell Automation filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Sep 24, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 4, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 4, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • May 5, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-05-05)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • May 5, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 17, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-15)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 17, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-02-10)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors0
    EDGAR →
  • Dec 22, 2025
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-02-10)0
    EDGAR →
  • Nov 12, 2025
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-09-30)Period: 2025-09-300
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →