Ralph Lauren Corporation

RL Consumer Cyclical · Apparel Manufacturing
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$391.07
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$306.55 — $421.60
-7% from high
Market cap
23.3B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
1.0%
P/E
24.6
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Deep value.

Ralph Lauren's revenue and profit rose in FY2025 amid tariff and restructuring pressures.

Bullish Beneish: -2.83Altman Z″: 6.55Piotroski: 8/9
RED DEEP 100 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.83
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
6.55
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
8
Strong
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The forensic scores point in a generally reassuring direction, but each measures something narrow. The Beneish M-Score is -2.830, below the -1.78 threshold and therefore not in the elevated manipulation-risk zone. It is a statistical screen built from ratios such as receivables, margins and asset quality, and a non-elevated reading is not proof that the reported numbers are accurate. The Altman Z″-Score of 6.55 falls in the safe zone, meaning the model sees low financial distress risk from its inputs; it says nothing about the business's strategy or competitive position. The Piotroski F-Score is 8 of 9 computable signals, a count of accounting-based tests on profitability, leverage and efficiency that were passed. Operating cash flow of $1.24 billion covered net income of $742.9 million at a ratio of 1.66, a supportive sign for earnings quality. Beyond the scores, the filings are specific about where pressure sits: the NGT project, promotional retail conditions, and the tariff and Red Sea shipping exposure described in the 10-Q. The brand portfolio includes Ralph Lauren, Double RL, Polo Ralph Lauren Children and Chaps, and royalty revenues from the non-reportable segments are about 2% of fiscal 2025 net revenues. The risk-factor excerpt also highlights dependence on Mr. Ralph Lauren and on wholesale customers affected by department store consolidation. Because the Item 1A excerpt is partly a table of contents and forward-looking statements, readers may want to review the full risk section in the 10-K directly. Equity rose to $2.59 billion from $2.45 billion, while total liabilities of $4.46 billion remain the larger claim on the balance sheet.

Catalyst.According to the fiscal 2025 figures in the data, revenue rose 6.8% to $7.08 billion from $6.63 billion, and operating income climbed to $932.1 million from $756.4 million. Net income reached $742.9 million, compared with $646.3 million in fiscal 2024. The 10-Q MD&A for the nine months ended December 27, 2025 describes the Next Generation Transformation project, a multi-year redesign of processes and technology meant to support a global direct-to-consumer-oriented model. Other charges tied to that project were $61.7 million for the nine months, against $17.1 million a year earlier. Fiscal 2025 segment revenue was roughly 43% North America, 31% Europe and 24% Asia, with about 57% earned outside the U.S.

Hidden risk.Management's narrative names tariffs, trade-war uncertainty and promotional retail pressure, and the risk-factor text cites 'increasing pressure on our margins in a highly promotional retail environment.' The restructuring costs are not presented as one-time: NGT charges were $25.0 million in the quarter versus $9.1 million a year earlier, and $61.7 million over nine months versus $17.1 million. Long-term debt fell from $1.14 billion to $742.9 million, but the filings also flag the need to maintain compliance with covenants on existing debt. The Beneish score is not in the elevated zone, yet readers may want to check whether operating cash flow stays well above net income across future periods.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what RL reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
7.2%
of the shares available to trade
Moderate
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
2.3M
Change since Aug 31
−19.9%
Days to cover
3.3

What it tells us

A noticeable minority of traders is betting that RL shares will fall.

Short sellers closed some of their bets: shares sold short fell 19.9% since the Aug 31 report.

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 3.3 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Ralph Lauren filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Sep 3, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors; Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 6, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 6, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 31, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.07: Shareholder vote results0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 5, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-02-05)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 5, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2025-12-27)Period: 2025-12-270
    EDGAR →
  • Jan 15, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-01-15)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Nov 6, 2025
    8-K
    Current report (2025-11-06)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Jun 20, 2025
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2025-07-31)0
    EDGAR →
  • May 22, 2025
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-03-29)Period: 2025-03-290
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →