Ralph Lauren Corporation

RL Consumer Cyclical · Apparel Manufacturing
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$397.61
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$266.20 — $421.60
-6% from high
Market cap
23.7B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
91.0%
P/E
26.3
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Deep value.

Deep Value (Bullish) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Bullish Beneish: -2.83Altman Z″: 6.07Piotroski: 8/9
RED DEEP 100 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.83
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
6.07
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
8
Strong
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

Ralph Lauren’s latest 10-Q, filed February 5, 2026, presents a financial picture that, by several forensic measures, suggests stability rather than distress. The Beneish M-Score, Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, registers at -2.8303, comfortably below the -1.78 threshold for elevated risk. Similarly, Altman’s Z″, Altman’s 1968 bankruptcy-distress index, stands at 6.07, placing the company firmly in the “safe” category well above the 2.60 benchmark. The filing’s Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis, explicitly aims to help provide an understanding of our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity for the three-month and nine-month periods ended December 27, 2025, suggesting a focus on transparent financial reporting.

The Piotroski F-Score, Piotroski’s 9-point fundamental strength scan, further reinforces this narrative with a score of 8.0 out of a possible 9.0. This high score indicates strong fundamental health across profitability, leverage, liquidity, and operating efficiency criteria, placing it well above the <4 weak signal. While the Fog Index, a readability score where 12 equals newspaper and 18+ suggests obfuscation, is not available for this filing, the quantitative metrics collectively paint a consistent portrait. The balance sheet, as of December 27, 2025, shows current assets of $4,189.3 million, including $2,031.9 million in cash and cash equivalents, and $1,149.4 million in inventories, providing a clear snapshot of asset composition.

Item 7’s MD&A structure begins with an ‘Overview’ section, which promises a general description of the business, global economic conditions, industry trends, and a summary of financial performance. It also states an intent to discuss ‘recent developments and transactions affecting comparability’ and to aid in ‘anticipating future trends.’ This organizational choice emphasizes a foundational understanding of the business context before diving into the ‘Results of operations.’ While standard, this structure provides a framework for interpreting the reported financial figures, such as the change in accounts receivable, net, from $459.5 million to $460.7 million, and inventories from $949.6 million to $1,149.4 million, between March 29, 2025, and December 27, 2025, respectively. The explicit mention of allowances for accounts receivable ($207.7 million) further details the quality of these assets.

This 10-Q provides a detailed, quantitatively strong view of Ralph Lauren’s financial condition and operational results for the reported period. The robust forensic scores and the structured MD&A offer a clear, if somewhat high-level, understanding of the company’s financial health as presented. However, the filing itself does not offer a definitive verdict on the security’s intrinsic value or future market performance. It does not delve into specific competitive dynamics, evolving consumer preferences, or the efficacy of long-term strategic initiatives beyond general industry trends. To assess whether the security is mispriced requires external analysis of these qualitative factors, alongside a deeper dive into the consolidated financial statements and notes. Read the 10-Q. Form your own conclusions.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • Feb 5, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-02-05)### Item 2.02 and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or o0
    Read →
  • Feb 5, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2025-12-27)Period: 2025-12-270
    Read →
  • Jan 15, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-01-15)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Nov 6, 2025
    8-K
    Material event (2025-11-06)### Item 2.02 and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or o0
    Read →
  • Jun 20, 2025
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2025-07-31)0
    Read →
  • May 22, 2025
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-03-29)Period: 2025-03-290
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about RL's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →