Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

REGN Healthcare · Biotechnology
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$631.81
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$518.90 — $821.11
-23% from high
Market cap
66.2B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
59.0%
P/E
15.4
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Deep value.

Deep Value (Bullish) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Bullish Beneish: -2.48Altman Z″: 7.19Piotroski: 5/9
RED DEEP 83 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.48
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
7.19
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
5
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

Regeneron’s 2026 10-Q provides a detailed look into its capital allocation strategy, particularly its share repurchase activity. The “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section of the MD&A notes that over 1,049,000 shares were purchased during the first quarter of 2026. These repurchases, a common capital allocation strategy where a company buys back its own stock to return value to shareholders, occurred at an average price ranging from $756.21 to $776.58 per share across the three months. As of March 31, 2026, approximately $688.2 million remained authorized for future repurchases under publicly announced programs, indicating a continued commitment to this approach. The filing also clarifies that a small portion of shares were withheld for employees to satisfy tax obligations upon restricted stock vesting, distinguishing these from the larger, publicly announced buybacks. This granular detail offers a clear view of how capital is being deployed.

The forensic scores for Regeneron present a consistent picture of financial health. The Beneish M-Score, Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, registers at -2.4809, which is well below the -1.78 threshold indicating elevated risk of earnings manipulation, suggesting conservative accounting practices. Similarly, Altman’s Z″, a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index, stands at 7.19, placing the company firmly in the “safe” zone, significantly above the 2.60 threshold for financial distress. This high score implies a robust balance sheet and strong operational performance. The Piotroski F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan (Piotroski, 2000), comes in at 5.0. While not in the “strong” category of 7+, it avoids the “weak” designation of below 4, suggesting a neutral-to-positive trend in its fundamental strength across profitability, leverage, liquidity, and operating efficiency. The Fog Index, a readability score, was not available for this particular filing.

Item 1A, typically reserved for risk factors, includes a lengthy enumeration of the company’s intellectual property. This list, which spans numerous registered trademarks and product names such as “Altibodies ™ ,” “ARCALYST ® ,” “Evkeeza ® ,” and “EYLEA ® ”, implicitly highlights the company’s reliance on its extensive portfolio of patented drugs and technologies. For a biotechnology firm, the strength and breadth of its intellectual property are critical assets, representing years of significant research and development investment. The sheer volume of named products underscores the importance of these intangible assets to future revenue streams and competitive positioning within the highly regulated pharmaceutical market. While presented within the risk factors, this detailed listing also serves as an inventory of the company’s core value drivers, emphasizing the ongoing need to protect and monetize these innovations against potential challenges.

This 10-Q provides a snapshot of Regeneron’s financial health and operational disclosures as of March 31, 2026. The robust forensic scores and detailed capital allocation data offer insight into management’s current financial posture and the company’s fundamental strength, painting a picture of stability. However, the filing cannot fully illuminate the broader competitive landscape of the biotechnology sector, the ongoing clinical trial outcomes for pipeline drugs, or the nuances of patent litigation that could impact future profitability. It also does not quantify the potential impact of new regulatory hurdles or shifting healthcare policies. While the document confirms a financially stable entity with a clear capital strategy, it does not provide a definitive answer on whether the security is mispriced, leaving that determination to a more comprehensive analysis of market dynamics, future growth prospects, and external industry factors.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • Apr 29, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-29)### Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition . On April 29, 2026, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. issued a press release announcing its financial0
    Read →
  • Apr 29, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    Read →
  • Apr 24, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-06-12)0
    Read →
  • Apr 8, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-08)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Feb 4, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    Read →
  • Jan 30, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-01-30)### Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition . On January 30, 2026, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. issued a press release announcing its financi0
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about REGN's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →