D-Wave Quantum Inc.

QBTS Technology · Computer Hardware
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$12.82
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$11.35 — $39.68
-68% from high
Market cap
4.9B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
—
No dividend declared
P/E
—
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Red flags.

Nine-month revenue rose to $21.8 million; warrant revaluations drove most of the $312.7 million loss.

Bearish Beneish: -5.04Altman Z″: -7.26Piotroski: 5/9Fog: 20.0
RED DEEP 35 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-5.04
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
-7.26
Distress zone
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
5
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
Fog Index MD&A readability
20.03
Obfuscatory prose
8 threshold ≥ 18 = murky 24
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The filings show a company with rising revenue, very large cash balances after 2025 financing, and accounting results dominated by non-cash warrant swings. The Beneish M-Score is -5.044, which is below -1.78 and labeled not in the elevated manipulation-risk zone; this is a screening output and does not confirm that the reported figures are accurate. The Altman Z-Score is -7.26, in the distress zone; this score is built from 2024 year-end balance sheet and profitability inputs, and it does not yet reflect the large 2025 cash position. The Piotroski F-Score is 5 of 8 computable signals, a middle reading that mixes improving and weak measures. The Fog Index is 20.03, labeled very hard to read, so the MD&A requires patience. The operating cash flow to net income ratio of 0.30 for 2024 indicates that most of the reported loss was not cash spending. Management's Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangements disclosed in this 10-Q cover up to 1,600,000 shares for the CEO, up to 500,000 for the CFO, and up to 122,785 for the General Counsel. The Equipment Financing Agreement carries a $13.8 million conditional commitment and a warrant for 21,563 shares issued August 1, 2025, and the filing reports no material pending legal proceedings. Readers may want to look at the warrant liability note and the 2024 10-K risk factors to understand how these items could affect future results.

Catalyst.Revenue is growing from a small base. Nine-month revenue through September 30, 2025 was $21.8 million, against $6.5 million a year earlier, and third-quarter revenue was $3.7 million versus $1.9 million. The filings say upgrade-project revenue is recognized over time using costs incurred relative to estimated total costs, so reported results depend heavily on cost estimates that are revised during a project. Cash and cash equivalents rose to $836.2 million at September 30, 2025 from $178.0 million at December 31, 2024, and the equity statements show share issuances and warrant exercises over the period. Full-year 2024 revenue was $8.83 million, up 0.8% from $8.76 million in 2023.

Hidden risk.The largest driver of the reported loss is not day-to-day operations. For the nine months ended September 30, 2025, net loss was $312.7 million, while the change in fair value of warrant liabilities was a charge of $260.0 million; operating loss was $65.5 million. Warrant liabilities rose to $141.0 million from $69.9 million at year-end 2024, and they are remeasured each period, so reported losses can swing with that revaluation. Cash flow also tells a different story than net income: 2024 operating cash flow was negative $42.6 million against a net loss of $143.9 million. The risk-factor excerpt provided does not list specific risks and refers readers to the 2024 Form 10-K, which may be worth reviewing.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what QBTS reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
21.2%
of the shares available to trade
Very high
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
70.9M
Change since Aug 31
−0.8%
Days to cover
4.5

What it tells us

Bets against QBTS are unusually crowded. If the price rises, short sellers racing to buy shares back can push it higher still. That is called a short squeeze.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (−0.8%).

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 4.5 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Quarterly report

The quarterly report (10-Q) and current reports (8-K) D-Wave Quantum filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Oct 1, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 22, 2026
    8-K/A
    Current report (amended)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 21, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 16, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 15, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 10, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 9, 2026
    8-K/A
    Current report (amended)Item 1.01: Signed a material agreement; Item 3.02: Unregistered sale of shares; Item 8.01: Other events
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 8, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 1.01: Signed a material agreement; Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials); Item 8.01: Other events
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 25, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 18, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 17, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 6, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
Recent material news

What the desk read this week

Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →