Quanta Services, Inc.

PWR Industrials · Engineering & Construction
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$714.45
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$363.01 — $788.75
-9% from high
Market cap
107.2B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
6.0%
P/E
98.0
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Deep value.

Deep Value (Bullish) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Bullish Beneish: -2.45Altman Z″: 5.93Piotroski: 6/9
RED DEEP 83 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.45
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
5.93
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
6
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

Quanta Services’ 2026 10-Q presents a management perspective on liquidity that is both confident and qualified. The MD&A, in Item 7, states an anticipation that sufficient funds to enable us to meet our cash requirements will be available for the next twelve months and over the longer term, drawing on operating cash flows, cash on hand, existing credit, and capital market access. This forward-looking statement, however, is immediately contextualized by the observation that working capital needs “may increase when we commence large volumes of work under circumstances where project costs are required to be paid before” revenue is collected.

The quantitative forensic scores largely align with a stable financial picture. Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, the M-Score, registers at -2.4491, which is below the -1.78 threshold for elevated manipulation risk. Altman’s 1968 bankruptcy-distress index, the Z″, stands at 5.93, placing the company firmly in the “safe” zone, well above the 2.60 threshold. Piotroski’s 2000 9-point fundamental strength scan, the F-Score, is 6.0, indicating a neutral position that neither signals strong fundamental health (7+) nor significant weakness (<4). The Fog Index, a readability score, is not available for this filing.

The MD&A’s discussion of liquidity in Item 7 is particularly instructive. While asserting confidence in future cash flows, the company explicitly notes that cash flow from operating activities is “also influenced by the timing of working capital needs associated with the various types of services that we provide.” This is a common dynamic in the engineering and construction sector, where large projects can create a temporary cash drain if expenses precede client payments. The filing highlights this operational reality as a key determinant of actual cash flow, despite overall liquidity assurances.

This filing provides a snapshot of management’s view on its financial position and the quantitative health metrics derived from its reported numbers. It can inform a reader about the company’s self-assessed liquidity and the current state of its accounting and fundamental strength. However, it does not offer insight into future demand for Quanta’s services, the specific timing of working capital fluctuations, or broader industry trends. Therefore, the filing alone cannot determine whether the security is mispriced, as that requires a deeper analysis of market conditions and valuation models beyond the scope of this quarterly report.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • Apr 30, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    Read →
  • Apr 30, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-30)### Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition . On April 30, 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. (the “Company” or “Quanta”) issued a press release announ0
    Read →
  • Apr 16, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-10)### Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers 0
    Read →
  • Apr 10, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-05-21)0
    Read →
  • Mar 4, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-02-26)### Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers 0
    Read →
  • Feb 19, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about PWR's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →