Phillips 66

PSX Energy · Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$174.05
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$118.07 — $190.61
-9% from high
Market cap
69.8B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
296.0%
P/E
17.2
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Deep value.

Deep Value (Bullish) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Bullish Beneish: -2.69Altman Z″: 3.64Piotroski: 6/9
RED DEEP 83 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.69
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
3.64
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
6
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

Phillips 66’s Q1 2026 10-Q reports sales and other operating revenues of $32,540 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, marking a notable increase from $30,430 million in the prior year period. This revenue growth is presented alongside a significant discussion in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) concerning environmental considerations. The company explicitly states it considers anticipated future GHG emissions in designing and developing major facilities and projects, and actively incorporates data on these emissions, associated legal requirements, and the possible physical effects of climate change on its coastal assets into its planning, investment, and risk management decision-making. Furthermore, the company notes its commitment to continuously improve operational and energy efficiency through resource and energy conservation efforts throughout its operations, highlighting a proactive stance on environmental management within the energy sector.

The forensic scores for Phillips 66 suggest a financially stable profile with low indicators of accounting risk. The Beneish M-Score (Beneish, 1999) — an eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector — registers at -2.694, which is comfortably below the -1.78 threshold that signals elevated manipulation risk. Altman’s Z″ (Altman, 1968) — a bankruptcy-distress index — stands at 3.64, placing the company firmly in the “safe” zone, well above the 2.60 benchmark for financial health. The Piotroski F-Score (Piotroski, 2000) — a 9-point fundamental strength scan — is 6.0. While this score does not reach the “strong” category of 7 or higher, it indicates a respectable level of fundamental health and operational efficiency, avoiding the “weak” designation for scores below 4. Collectively, these metrics paint a picture of a company with sound financial reporting and a low probability of near-term distress.

Within Item 7, the MD&A elaborates on the company’s approach to environmental planning, noting the implementation of energy efficiency initiatives to reduce GHG emissions. This involves working to continuously improve operational and energy efficiency through resource and energy conservation efforts throughout its operations. Beyond environmental disclosures, the filing also highlights the company’s structural financial arrangements, specifically mentioning “various cross guarantees between Phillips 66 and its wholly owned subsidiary Phillips 66 Company” (together, the Obligor Group) with respect to publicly held debt securities. This guarantor financial information (the company’s disclosure of inter-company debt backing) indicates a consolidated financial structure where the parent and its primary operating subsidiary share debt obligations, which can impact how creditors and investors assess the creditworthiness of the overall enterprise. The presence of such cross-guarantees is a material detail for understanding the company’s debt profile.

This 10-Q provides a quarterly financial update and a detailed glimpse into management’s stated strategic priorities, particularly concerning environmental governance and operational efficiency. While the forensic scores indicate a robust financial position and low earnings manipulation risk, the filing does not offer a crystal ball into future energy prices, unforeseen geopolitical events, or the long-term efficacy of the company’s climate-related investments. It details current operational results, cost structures, and risk acknowledgments but cannot predict the broader market’s interpretation of these factors or the security’s ultimate valuation. The document serves as a factual basis for understanding the company’s reported performance and its explicit planning considerations, but it does not dictate the security’s future trajectory.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • Apr 29, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    Read →
  • Apr 29, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-29)### Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition . On April 29, 2026, Phillips 66 issued a press release announcing the company's financial and opera0
    Read →
  • Apr 6, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-06)### Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition . On April 6, 2026, Phillips 66 (the “Company”) issued guidance providing preliminary first-quarter 0
    Read →
  • Apr 2, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-05-13)0
    Read →
  • Mar 18, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-03-13)### Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement . Term Loan Agreement On March 18, 2026 (the “Term Loan Closing Date”), Phillips 66 Company (the “Compa0
    Read →
  • Feb 20, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about PSX's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →