Parker-Hannifin Corporation

PH Industrials · Specialty Industrial Machinery
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$961.75
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$722.12 — $1,099.94
-13% from high
Market cap
121.3B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
0.8%
P/E
33.8
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Deep value.

Fiscal 2025 cash flow outpaced earnings; nine-month profit slipped despite higher sales.

Bullish Beneish: -2.47Altman Z″: 4.56Piotroski: 7/9
RED DEEP 100 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.47
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
4.56
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
7
Strong
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

Parker's fiscal 2025 annual figures are internally consistent. Revenue of $19.85 billion was down 0.4% from $19.93 billion, while net income rose to $3.53 billion from $2.84 billion and operating cash flow reached $3.78 billion, giving an operating cash flow to net income ratio of 1.07. Long-term debt fell to $7.5 billion from $8.41 billion, and equity rose to $13.68 billion from $12.07 billion. The forensic scores should be read against their labels. The Beneish M-Score is -2.468, below the -1.78 threshold, so it is not in the elevated manipulation-risk zone. This is a screening measure that compares several ratios across years and is not proof of anything either way. The Altman Z″-Score is 4.56, in the safe zone, meaning the model does not flag financial distress risk for this industrial company. The Piotroski F-Score is 7 of 8 computable signals, a count of simple profitability, leverage and efficiency checks, with seven of the eight computable checks passing. The 10-Q narrative is more mixed than the annual totals. Management describes broad growth, but nine-month net income declined, and currency, acquisitions and divestitures account for a large share of the sales change. Readers may want to look at the Aerospace Systems segment results, because the excerpt names that segment as a growth driver but truncates its figures. Readers may also want to look at the MD&A tariff disclosures and the Curtis Instruments acquisition described in the 10-K acquisition section, to see how the deal and any refund outcome affect future reported results.

Catalyst.According to the 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2026, nine-month net sales rose to $15,744 million from $14,607 million, an increase of about 7.8%. Management attributes the growth to higher sales in both Aerospace Systems and Diversified Industrial, aided by currency effects of about $242 million and the Curtis acquisition, which added about $161 million, partly offset by divestitures that reduced sales by about $146 million. Diversified Industrial operating income for the nine months was $2,438 million, up from $2,273 million. Gross profit margin rose to 37.2% from 36.7%, which management ties to higher volumes, favorable product mix and cost containment.

Hidden risk.Nine-month net income fell to $2,557 million from $2,609 million even as sales rose. The prior-year period included $262 million of gains on disposal of assets and divestitures, compared with $8 million this year, and the effective tax rate rose to 20.7% from 14.1%. The 10-K flags exposure to steel, copper, aluminum and nickel, and to electric power costs. The 10-Q says the U.S. Supreme Court found IEEPA tariffs unauthorized in February 2026, but Parker has not recorded a receivable for possible refunds, and Middle East conflict could raise commodity, energy and logistics costs.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what PH reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
1.2%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
1.5M
Change since Aug 31
+9.8%
Days to cover
2.4

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against PH. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (+9.8%).

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 2.4 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual reports, quarterly report & proxy statement

The annual reports (10-K), quarterly report (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Parker-Hannifin filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Sep 14, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 10, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 8, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 21, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 6, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • May 1, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 30, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-30)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 17, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-03-13)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors0
    EDGAR →
  • Jan 29, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-01-29)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 19, 2025
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2025-10-22)0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 22, 2025
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-06-30)Period: 2025-06-300
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →