The Progressive Corporation

PGR Financial Services · Insurance - Property & Casualty
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$213.75
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$189.20 — $239.38
-11% from high
Market cap
124.1B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
0.2%
P/E
10.8
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Fairly valued.

Progressive's 2025 profit surged, but Commercial Lines growth leaned on renewals and softer applications

Neutral Beneish: -2.61Piotroski: 5/9
RED DEEP 74 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.61
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
5
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The filings show strong underwriting results, but several items need a careful read. The 2025 operating cash flow of $17.55 billion against net income of $11.31 billion gives a ratio of 1.55, which means reported profit was backed by cash generated in the year. Equity rose from $25.59 billion to $30.32 billion, while liabilities of $92.72 billion against assets of $123.04 billion show a leveraged balance sheet, which is normal for an insurer. In March 2026 the company issued $500 million of 4.60% Senior Notes due 2031 and $1.0 billion of 5.15% Senior Notes due 2036. Total capital reached $40.4 billion at March 31, 2026, up $3.2 billion from year-end 2025, after $2.2 billion of comprehensive income and $478 million of share repurchases. The Beneish M-Score is -2.611, which is below the -1.78 threshold and therefore not in the elevated manipulation-risk zone. This is a screening result, not proof that the numbers are accurate. The Piotroski F-Score is 5 of 5 computable signals, meaning all five signals that could be computed passed the standard checks. No Altman Z-Score or Fog Index value is given because neither is on file. Readers may want to look at the Commercial Lines discussion in the 10-Q, where the TNC renewal effect and the shift toward 6-month policies both affect comparability. Readers may also want to review the personal property section, where management is reopening new business in states it had restricted, and compare the 2022 net income of $721.5 million with later years to see how sensitive earnings have been to catastrophe and reserve results.

Catalyst.The MD&A for the quarter ended March 31, 2026 points to growth as the main driver. Companywide net premiums written reached $23.6 billion, up $1.4 billion or 6% from the first quarter of 2025, and policies in force rose 9% to 3.3 million more. Personal Lines, which made up 83% of net premiums written at period end, grew net premiums written 7%, led by personal auto policies in force up 11%. The companywide underwriting profit margin was 13.6%, compared with 14.0% a year earlier, and advertising spend rose 20% to $1.5 billion. For full-year 2025, revenues were $87.67 billion, up 16.3% from $75.37 billion, and net income was $11.31 billion versus $8.48 billion in 2024.

Hidden risk.The growth is narrower than the headline totals suggest. Excluding the transportation network company (TNC) business, Commercial Lines net premiums written fell 1% in the first quarter of 2026, and new business applications in core commercial auto dropped 6%. The TNC increase came mainly from renewals of policies with higher projected mileage. Management also warns that tariffs could raise vehicle loss costs and require higher rate increases than planned. The property business is concentrated in hurricane- and hail-exposed states, and loss reserves may ultimately differ from current estimates. Comprehensive income fell $1.2 billion in the quarter on unrealized losses on fixed-maturity securities. The Altman Z-Score and Fog Index are not on file here.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what PGR reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
1.2%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
6.8M
Change since Aug 31
+12.8%
Days to cover
2.5

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against PGR. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Short sellers added to their bets: shares sold short grew 12.8% since the Aug 31 report.

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 2.5 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) The Progressive filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Oct 14, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 18, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 19, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 10, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 3, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 15, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • May 4, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 15, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-15)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 26, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-03-23)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 23, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-05-08)0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 18, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-03-18)Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 2, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →