Principal Financial Group, Inc.

PFG Financial Services · Asset Management
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$108.51
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$75.00 — $112.45
-4% from high
Market cap
23.4B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
304.0%
P/E
15.6
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Watch.

Watch (Caution) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Caution Beneish: -2.52Altman Z″: 0.17Piotroski: 5/9
RED DEEP 49 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.52
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
0.17
Distress zone
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
5
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

Principal Financial Group’s latest 10-Q, filed April 29, 2026, presents an Altman Z″ of 0.17, a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index, placing it firmly in the “distress” zone (below 1.10). This quantitative signal finds a qualitative echo in the MD&A’s discussion of market volatility within its critical accounting policies and estimates for benefit plans. The company estimates an immediate 10% downward equity shock, followed by a 2% per quarter increase, would reduce its annual segment pre-tax operating earnings by approximately 5% to 8% over the next twelve months. This illustration, while not a prediction of future market events, highlights the potential impact of such an event. The filing also notes equity risk associated with certain domestic assets, separate and distinct from general equity index declines, suggesting a multi-faceted exposure.

The forensic scores offer a mixed, though concerning, picture. Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector registers at -2.525, which does not indicate elevated manipulation risk (threshold >-1.78). However, Altman’s Z″, a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index, stands at a stark 0.17, well below the 1.10 threshold for distress. Piotroski’s F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan, comes in at 5.0. While not indicating strong fundamental health (7+), it also does not flag as weak (<4). The Fog Index, a readability score, is not available for this filing.

Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis, delves into critical accounting policies and estimates related to benefit plans, specifically addressing equity risk. The company’s sensitivity analysis, while not a forecast, highlights its vulnerability to market movements. It explicitly states that a 10% downward equity shock could reduce pre-tax operating earnings by 5% to 8% over the next twelve months. This discussion is further nuanced by the caveat that “The selection of a 10% unfavorable equity shock should not be construed as a prediction by us of future market events, but rather as an illustration of the potential impact of such an event.” The filing also notes that exposure will change as a result of changes in our mix of business, suggesting a dynamic risk profile that requires ongoing assessment, including equity risk associated with certain domestic assets.

This reading of the 10-Q provides a forensic lens on Principal Financial Group’s reported financial condition and its self-assessed market sensitivities. It clearly flags a significant bankruptcy-distress signal via Altman’s Z″ and details management’s own illustration of equity market risk, including specific domestic exposures. What the filing cannot provide is a definitive answer on the security’s valuation or future trajectory. That requires external analysis of broader economic trends, the specific performance of its evolving “mix of business,” and the efficacy of any strategic adjustments to mitigate identified risks. The document does, however, offer a clear framework for understanding the internal view of its financial vulnerabilities and the potential for market events to impact earnings.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • Apr 29, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    Read →
  • Apr 23, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-23)### Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition On April 23, 2026, Principal Financial Group, Inc . publicly announced information regarding its res0
    Read →
  • Apr 20, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-20)### Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure This report is filed quarterly to disclose assets under management (“AUM”) by asset manager, prior to the availability of0
    Read →
  • Apr 6, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-05-19)0
    Read →
  • Feb 18, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    Read →
  • Feb 9, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-02-09)### Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition On February 9, 2026, Principal Financial Group, Inc . publicly announced information regarding its r0
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about PFG's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →