Paychex, Inc.

PAYX Technology · Software - Application
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$126.48
Aug 27, 2026
52-week range
$85.45 — $139.53
-9% from high
Market cap
45B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
381.0%
P/E
25.8
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Aug 27, 2026

Deep value.

Paychex stability faces headwinds as interest rate tailwinds peak and SMB growth moderates.

Bullish Beneish: -2.30Altman Z″: 2.61Piotroski: 4/9
RED DEEP 83 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.30
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
2.61
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
4
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

Paychex’s recent 10-Q presents a picture of financial stability, at least according to one prominent metric. Altman’s Z″ — a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index — registers 2.61, placing the company just into the “safe” category (scores above 2.60). The management’s discussion in Item 7, as excerpted, focuses on the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures, rather than specific operational or financial performance trends, asserting their design ensures information is “recorded, processed, summarized, and reported” appropriately.

The forensic scores offer a more nuanced view. Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, the M-Score, sits at -2.304, which is below the -1.78 threshold, indicating no elevated manipulation risk. This contrasts with Altman’s Z″, which at 2.61 suggests a low probability of financial distress. Piotroski’s F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan, stands at 4.0. While not signaling “weakness” (which would be below 4), it suggests a neutral fundamental position rather than strong financial health (7+). The Fog Index — a readability score; 12 = newspaper, 18+ = obfuscatory — is not available for this filing.

The provided excerpt from Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis, is notable for its focus on procedural assertions rather than operational specifics. It states that disclosure controls and procedures are designed with the objective of ensuring that information…is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported in a timely manner. This passage, while standard, offers no specific insights into current financial performance, operational challenges, or future outlook. Instead, it confirms the company’s internal reporting mechanisms are deemed effective as of the period end, which is a necessary but not sufficient condition for comprehensive financial understanding.

This reading, anchored strictly to the provided filing excerpts and forensic scores, offers a limited view of Paychex’s operational dynamics. While the Altman Z″ suggests solvency and the Beneish M-Score does not flag manipulation risk, the Piotroski F-Score indicates a neutral fundamental strength. The excerpted MD&A confirms the company’s assessment of its disclosure controls but provides no qualitative discussion of financial results or strategic direction. Therefore, this filing alone cannot inform a view on whether the security is mispriced, as it lacks the granular operational and forward-looking context typically found in a complete 10-Q.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about PAYX's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →