Palo Alto Networks, Inc.

PANW Technology · Software - Infrastructure
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$370.27
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$139.57 — $432.33
-14% from high
Market cap
302.9B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
—
No dividend declared
P/E
925.7
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Watch.

Palo Alto Networks grew revenue 14.9% while net income fell, amid pending CyberArk deal.

Caution Beneish: -2.80Altman Z″: 1.09Piotroski: 5/9
RED DEEP 49 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.80
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
1.09
Distress zone
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
5
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The filings show a company growing its top line and generating large operating cash flow, but the forensic readings need context. The Beneish M-Score is -2.800, which is below the -1.78 threshold and outside the elevated manipulation-risk zone. That is a screening result, not proof either way. Operating cash flow of $3.72 billion was 3.28 times net income of $1.13 billion in fiscal 2025, meaning cash generated exceeded reported profit. That relationship is consistent with the Beneish reading, but it does not explain why net income fell from $2.58 billion the prior year. The Altman Z″-Score of 1.09 is in the distress zone because it sits below 1.10. This model estimates financial distress from balance-sheet and earnings ratios. It does not measure near-term ability to pay, and the same year produced $3.72 billion of operating cash, so treat the zone as a model output that calls for caution rather than a statement about solvency. Total liabilities of $15.75 billion against assets of $23.58 billion, with equity of $7.82 billion up from $5.17 billion, show a balance sheet that expanded considerably, and the score is sensitive to that structure. The Piotroski F-Score is 5 of 7 computable signals, meaning five of the seven computable checks passed. Management's narrative emphasizes platformization and AI security, while the 10-K risk factors emphasize regulatory exposure, including the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Anti-Bribery Act, and Section 404 internal control requirements. Readers may want to look at the 10-Q's treatment of the CyberArk Notes and the $1.0 billion of remaining repurchase authorization that expires December 31, 2026.

Catalyst.According to the fiscal 2025 10-K (year ended July 31, 2025), revenue rose 14.9% to $9.22 billion from $8.03 billion, and operating income climbed to $1.24 billion from $683.9 million. The filings describe a platformization strategy that consolidates point products into bundled platforms: Prisma Access and Prisma SD-WAN for SASE, the Cortex platform for security operations and cloud security, and Prisma AIRS for AI security. Operating cash flow reached $3.72 billion in fiscal 2025, up from $3.26 billion a year earlier. The 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2026 also highlights the proposed acquisition of CyberArk Software Ltd. and management's expectations for its benefits and synergies.

Hidden risk.The most material tension sits between profit lines. Operating income rose to $1.24 billion, yet net income fell from $2.58 billion in fiscal 2024 to $1.13 billion in fiscal 2025. The data provided does not explain that gap, so readers may want to check the income statement and tax disclosures in the 10-K. The Altman Z″-Score of 1.09 is in the distress zone. The 10-Q also discloses CyberArk's $1.25 billion of 0.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2030, which the risk factors say could be settled in shares and dilute existing stockholders, against an authorized common share count of 2.0 billion. Completion of the acquisition is itself a stated risk.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what PANW reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
2.7%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
21.6M
Change since Aug 31
+0.9%
Days to cover
3.1

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against PANW. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (+0.9%).

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 3.1 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual reports, quarterly report & proxy statement

The annual reports (10-K), quarterly report (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Palo Alto Networks filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Sep 10, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report0
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 1, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 21, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors; Item 5.03: Charter or bylaw change; fiscal-year change
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 13, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-08)Item 1.01: Signed a material agreement; Item 2.03: New debt or other financial obligation0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 23, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-03-23)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 11, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-03-10)Item 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 18, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-01-31)Period: 2026-01-310
    EDGAR →
  • Nov 7, 2025
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2025-12-09)0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 29, 2025
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-07-31)Period: 2025-07-310
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →