Palo Alto Networks, Inc.

PANW Technology · Software - Infrastructure
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$332.00
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$139.57 — $332.76
-0% from high
Market cap
270.6B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
No dividend declared
P/E
286.2
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Deep value.

Deep Value (Bullish) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Bullish Beneish: -2.80Altman Z″: 7.10Piotroski: 5/9
RED DEEP 83 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.80
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
7.10
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
5
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

Palo Alto Networks’ 2026 10-Q presents a curious juxtaposition: a company whose MD&A dedicates significant space to the potential for estimates and internal controls to affect operating results, even as its quantitative forensic scores suggest a stable financial footing. The filing notes that if actual circumstances differ from our estimates, judgments or assumptions, operating results “may be adversely affected.” This cautionary language from management, found in Item 7, precedes the detailed financial statements, setting a tone of procedural vigilance.

The forensic scores largely affirm this stability. The Beneish M-Score, Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, registers at -2.8002, well below the -1.78 threshold for elevated manipulation risk. Altman’s Z″, Altman’s 1968 bankruptcy-distress index, stands at a robust 7.1, indicating a low probability of financial distress. The Piotroski F-Score, Piotroski’s 9-point fundamental strength scan, comes in at 5.0. While not signaling exceptional fundamental health (7+), it also does not flag weakness (below 4), suggesting a neutral but not concerning operational profile.

Within Item 7, the company emphasizes its obligation to maintain “proper and effective internal control over financial reporting.” It warns that failure to complete its analysis in a timely manner, or a determination that controls are ineffective, “may adversely affect investor confidence in our company.” This passage highlights a critical, albeit procedural, risk: even with strong reported financials, any perceived weakness in the underlying control environment can erode trust and, by extension, the perceived value of the enterprise.

This filing, therefore, offers a view into Palo Alto Networks’ reported financial health and management’s explicit concerns regarding the integrity of its reporting processes. It does not, however, provide insight into the competitive landscape, the efficacy of its product roadmap, or the broader macroeconomic trends that might influence its future performance. The document details the internal mechanisms and risks of financial reporting, rather than offering a comprehensive investment thesis.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • Apr 13, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-08)### Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement . On April 8, 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into three lease amendments (colle0
    Read →
  • Mar 23, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-03-23)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Mar 11, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-03-10)### Item 8.01 Other Events . On March 10, 2026, the Board of Directors of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (the “Company”) approved the repurchase of up to an additiona0
    Read →
  • Feb 18, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-01-31)Period: 2026-01-310
    Read →
  • Nov 7, 2025
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2025-12-09)0
    Read →
  • Aug 29, 2025
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-07-31)Period: 2025-07-310
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about PANW's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →